Open Access

Therapeutic dendritic cell vaccine preparation using tumor RNA transfection: A promising approach for the treatment of prostate cancer

  • Juliana M Sousa-Canavez1Email author,
  • Flavio C Canavez1,
  • Kátia RM Leite1, 2 and
  • Luiz H Camara-Lopes1
Genetic Vaccines and Therapy20086:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-6-2

Received: 22 October 2007

Accepted: 18 January 2008

Published: 18 January 2008

Abstract

Background

Early prostate adenocarcinoma can be diagnosed through seric prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screenings. However, a fraction of patients progress to an incurable metastatic disease. Therefore, novel therapies for treating these patients are extremely desirable. Therapeutic vaccines based on Dendritic Cells (DCs) carrying tumor antigens have emerged as a promising strategy to initiate an immune response against tumor cells. These vaccines can be prepared using different methodologies, such as the application of tumor mRNA described in this work.

Methods

Mature and immature DCs were obtained in vitro by adding specific cytokines to monocyte cell cultures. RNA extracted from prostate tumor lineage (LNCAP) was introduced into these cells by electroporation and co-incubation. Transfection success was measured by immunocytochemistry of the PSA expression level in DCs.

Results

Cell surface markers, including CD14, CD80, CD86, CCR7, CD11c, and CD1a, confirmed mature and immature DC phenotypes. Both cell maturation stages were successfully used for RNA introduction as shown by PSA characterization.

Conclusion

Our data support the use of mature and immature DCs for vaccine preparation with either RNA electroporation or RNA co-incubation. The highest efficiency, however, was observed when RNA was delivered by electroporation into mature DCs. Due to in vitro RNA transcription, this method allows small tumors to be used for DC vaccine preparation; it is therefore a promising approach for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

Background

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignancy diagnosed in males and the second most common cause of cancer death. In its latest report, the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA) estimated that 47,280 new cases of prostate cancer, or 51 new prostate cancer cases for each 100,000 men, arise in Brazil each year [1]. Because of their population screenings using prostate-specific antigens (PSA), the south and southeastern regions of Brazil are expected to exhibit the highest incidence.

Seric PSA level has aided in the diagnosis of very small prostate tumors. This, in association with radical prostatectomy and radiation therapies, has contributed to increasing the curative indexes [2]. After several years of primary therapy, however, PSA levels can rise even in patients with good outcomes predicted by tumor histological parameters. Roughly one-third of these patients progress to incurable metastatic disease, for which there are few treatment options. The chemotherapy currently used has limited efficacy [3, 4]. This lack of treatment has led scientists around the world to search for new therapeutic options [5]; one of these options involves the use of Dendritic Cell (DCs) immunotherapy.

Clinical trails based on DCs have been conducted for the treatment of patients with a variety of tumor types [68]. Two of these trials were performed by our group, which developed individualized therapeutic vaccines by fusing allogeneic DCs and neoplastic cells isolated from surgically-removed tumors. We have observed only minor side effects but significant clinical benefits like disease stability in 80% of patients after 2–3 doses of vaccine. The mean survival rate was 13 months for melanoma patients and 6 months for renal cell carcinoma patients [9].

DC immunotherapy based on cell fusion depends on large size tumors (>1 gram) and cannot be applied in most cases of prostate cancer. This barrier does not prevent its use, since different methods of vaccine preparation have been described [68]. For prostate cancer, DCs are most commonly primed with entire or partial tissue-specific antigens or tumor-associated antigens. Alternatively, mRNA molecules can be transfected into DCs so that entire proteins will be translated, processed, and presented by MHC on the cell surface. Both methods have already been used in clinical trials and were able to initiate immune response; for a review, see [10].

Here, we compare two methods, electroporation and co-incubation, for transfecting RNA into DCs. The amount of RNA and the DC maturation stage for transfection were also analyzed. The prostate tumor cell line (LNCaP) was chosen for this study because it overexpresses PSA and permits easy DC characterization via immunocytochemistry using anti-PSA antibodies.

Methods

Reagents

Culture medium consisted of AIM-V or RPMI-1640 supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS), streptomycin, and penicillin (all from GIBCO, Rockville, MD, USA). Recombinant human cytokines like granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin 4 (IL-4), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were purchased from Peprotech Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Ficoll-Hypaque used in cell separation was purchased from Amersham (Piscataway, NJ, USA).

Dendritic cell culture

As described in Barbuto et al. [9], peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected from informed, consenting, healthy donors through apheresis performed in a Cobe Spectra Blood Cell Separator 7.0 (Cobe, Lakewood, CO, USA) that had been programmed for mononuclear cell collection. Acid citrate dextrose was used as a blood anticoagulant (ratio of 1:8–1:11). Mononuclear cells were separated by density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll-Paque 1,077 g/dl). After three washes with RPMI 1640 medium, mononuclear cells were resuspended in AIM-V at a density of 1.3 × 107 cells/mL and allowed to adhere to culture flasks for 2 h at 37°C in a humidified incubator. Floating cells were gently removed, and AIM-V containing GM-CSF (50 ng/mL) and IL-4 (50 ng/mL) were added. Flasks were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator for 5 days. For immature DC recovery, cultured cells were harvested on the 5th day. For mature DCs, TNF-α (50 ng/mL) was added to the medium on the 5th day and cultured cells were harvested on the 7th day.

Cell surface phenotype by flow-cytometric analysis

Determination of phenotype was performed by two-color immunostaining using combinations of FITC- and PE-labeled mAbs directed to human CD14, CD80, CD86, CCR7, CD11c, and CD1a (all purchased from BD-Pharmingen, CA, USA). Corresponding isotype-matched mAbs were used as controls. Cells (1 × 106) were resuspended in PBS containing bovine serum albumin 0.1% and then incubated for 20 min at 4°C with optimal concentrations of monoclonal antibodies. Membrane markers were determined by flow cytometry (FACScalibur, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, CA, USA), and data from 10,000 events were analyzed by Cell Quest Pro software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems). Results are expressed as the percentage of positive cells.

Tumor cell culture

The LNCaP cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and cultivated in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, streptomycin 100 mg/mL, and penicillin 100 U/mL at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator.

Tumor RNA preparation

LNCaP cells cultivated in RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS were harvested and maintained at -80°C until RNA extraction. The RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) following the supplier's recommendations. RNA concentration and purity were estimated in a 260/280 nm spectrophotometer. RNA integrity was verified using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent technologies, CA, USA).

Dendritic cell transfection with LNCaP tumor cell RNA

Boczkowski et al. [11] suggested that RNA introduction alone activates DCs and causes them to mature. Based on this knowledge, we tested mature and immature DC transfection. Suspensions of DCs (4 × 106 cells/mL) were harvested at the 5th (immature cells) and 7th (mature DC) day of culture after TNF-α addition. Different conditions of transfection were used. For mature DCs, 4 μg and 5 μg RNA were electroporated with 300, 400, and 500 V pulses; additionally, we incubated cells with 5 μg RNA. For immature DCs, 4 μg and 16 μg were used for transfection with 300 and 400 V pulses. The electroporation was performed in a 4-mm curvette at 25 μF capacitance.

Kinetics of tumor antigen expression

The expression of the tumoral antigen PSA was examined 24 h after transfection via immunocytochemistry with antibodies to PSA and the androgen receptor (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Briefly, DCs were recovered from culture plates using a cell scraper. Cells were fixed in 70% alcohol and submitted to 900 g centrifugation for 5 min at room temperature. The cytocentrifugate were impressed on adhesive coated slides and incubated overnight at 4°C with monoclonal antibodies to PSA or the androgen receptor at a dilution of 1:50 in PBS. Then, biotinylated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G was applied at a 1:200 dilution for 60 minutes at room temperature. Slides were rinsed with PBS for 30 minutes, incubated with peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (streptABC Kit, Dako) at a 1:400 dilution in PBS for 45 minutes at room temperature, and rinsed with PBS for 30 minutes. Color was developed by incubating the slides in 0.06% diaminobenzidine in PBS for 15 minutes. Slides were then rinsed in tapwater, counterstained with Harris hematoxylin, dehydrated, coverslipped, and reviewed under a light microscope.

Results

No single marker is exclusively present on the DC surface. Therefore, DC characterization requires the investigation of several cell surface markers [12]. In this study, these markers included CD80, CD86, CD14, CD11c, and CD1a; expression levels were measured on the 5th and 7th days of monocyte cell culture. All observed values are displayed at Table 1.
Table 1

Phenotypic characterization of immature and mature DCs by flow-cytometry.

Membrane markers

Immature DC

Mature DC

CD80

11.5%

48.4%

CD86

65.2%

82.4%

CD11c

84.9%

88.1%

CD14

0.59%

0.48%

CD1a

49.9%

97.9%

CCR7

1.75%

50.5%

Phenotype determination was performed by two color immunostaining using combinations of FITC- and PE labeled mAbs. Cells (1 × 106) were resuspended in PBS containing bovine serum albumin 0.1% and then incubated for 20 min at 4°C with optimal concentrations of the monoclonal antibodies. Membrane markers were determined by flow cytometry, and data from 10,000 events in mononuclear cell gates were collected and analyzed by Cell Quest Pro software. Results are expressed as the percentage of positive cells.

Monocyte cell cultures were obtained after apheresis and cultivated with cytokines (GM-CSF, IL-4, and TNF-α). We observed high levels of adhesion molecule CD11c (a myeloid blood DC marker) and low expression of monocyte/macrophage marker CD14 at both the 5th and 7th days, before and after TNF-α addition, respectively (Table 1). These expression patterns confirm a low percentage of monocytes at both cell culture stages.

DC maturation was characterized by an augmentation in the expression of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 (Table 1). At the 5th day of differentiation, cells presented low levels of CD80 (a maturation marker) and CD86 (an early maturation marker). Furthermore, the percentage of cells expressing CD1a and CCR7 was also low. These expression levels are in accordance with the pattern observed for immature DCs. At this point, TNF-α was added to the culture medium and caused DC maturation as indicated by the increased expression of CD80, CD86, CD1a, and CCR7 at the 7th day. Immature (5th day) and mature (7th day) DCs were used for RNA transfections.

The efficiency of RNA transfection into DCs was investigated by immunocytochemistry using an anti-PSA antibody. All but one condition used for DC vaccine preparations resulted in PSA expression, as shown in Figures 1 (immature DCs) and 2 (mature DCs). A negative PSA assay was observed for one co-incubation condition (Figure 2-IIIB). Overall, the best transfection efficiency was observed for mature DC transfected via 400 V pulse electroporation with 5 μg total RNA (Figure 2-IIB). Expression of the androgen receptor was also positive, confirming the success of this strategy (Figure 3).
Figure 1

PSA antigen expression of immature DCs transfected with total RNA from LNCaP cells. Immature DCs were transfected by electroporation with 4 μg (IA and IB) and 16 μg (IIA and IIB) of RNA from LNCaP cells. The electroporation conditions were 300 (IA and IIA) or 400 V (IB and IIB). In both cases, the capacitance was 25 μF. IIIA is the negative transfection control, and IIIB is the positive control represented by LNCaP. The panel of photographs represents PSA expression detected by immunocytochemistry using an anti-PSA antibody.

Figure 2

PSA antigen expression of mature DCs transfected with total RNA from LNCaP cells. Mature DCs were transfected by electroporation with 4 μg (IA, B, and C) and 5 μg (IIA, B, and C) or coincubated with 5 μg (IIIA, B, and C) of RNA from LNCaP cells. The electroporation conditions were 300 (IA and IIA), 400 (IB and IIB), or 500 V (IC and IIC). In all cases, the capacitance was 25 μF. The transfection by coincubation was done without preincubation (IIIA) and with 30 minutes (IIIB) or 2 hours (IIIC) of preincubation at 22°C. Photos IVA and IVB are negative transfection controls, and IVC is the positive control represented by LNCaP cells. The panel of photographs represents PSA expression detected by immunocytochemistry using an anti-PSA antibody.

Figure 3

Androgen receptor expression after mature DC transfection with total RNA from LNCaP cells. (A) Mature DCs were transfected with 5 μg of LNCaP total RNA using 400 V electroporation and a capacitance of 25 μF. (B) Negative control of transfection represented by DCs, and (C) Positive control represented by LNCaP cells.

Discussion

Immune responses depend on a variety of cellular processes, including transport of the MHC complex to the antigen presenting cell surface and its recognition by T-cell receptors as non-self. The core of these activities, however, is the MHC-peptide ligation. This ligation occurs in a restricted manner, in which each peptide binds only to its appropriate MHC. Thus, the use of selected peptides to pulse DC might fail because of the absence of specific MHCs. In Caucasians, HLA-A2 is frequent and motivates scientists to focus on HLA-A2-restricted peptides [13, 14]. For other populations, this approach might not be an option because of the high genetic diversity observed. This is the case for the Brazilian population, which consists of three main ethnic groups (Caucasian, Black, and Amerindians). Furthermore, the Brazilian racial pattern is characterized by extensive miscegenation [15, 16]. For this reason, we believe that mRNA molecules are the best choice for preparing therapeutic DC vaccines.

Different strategies have been proposed to transfect RNA into monocyte derived DCs, including electroporation and lipofection and others are still in development. Improvement of DC loading with RNA is an important issue for DC vaccine. RNA has the advantages of an efficient cytoplasmic expression allowing the use of total tumor antigens repertoire, and safe, because of its transient expression allied to non integrative properties into the host genome (for a review see [17]).

In our experiments, RNA molecules were introduced into immature and mature DCs, allowing both to be used in trials. Previous studies in prostate patients have shown that immune responses were initiated by vaccines with immature [18] and mature [19] DCs. However, a comparison study shows that the latter were superior to the former in the induction of immunological responses in melanoma patients [20]. The same conclusion was presented by McIlroy and Gregoire [21], who showed correlation between TNF and favorable responses in meta-analyses of ten clinical trials in melanoma patients (167 patients total). These data support mature DCs as the best choice for conducting clinical trials.

We prepared DC vaccines using allogeneic DCs transfected with cell culture RNA. Since MHC is highly polymorphic, there is a considerable possibility of MHC-mismatch among patients and leukapheresis donors. This difference can provoke immune responses against donor DCs instead of the tumor proteins that they carry. This problem could be solved by using patient peripheric blood to generate DCs. Most cancer patients, however, are already immunocompromised and debilitated due to previous treatment. Moreover, one tumor escape mechanism involves the inactivation of DC function. Thus, the use of patients' blood to obtain DCs may not be an option in all cases. Clinical observations, on the other hand, have shown that autologous DCs might be unnecessary; three patients negative for HLA-A2 were able to initiate immune responses after vaccination with HLA-A2 DCs loaded with PSMA peptide [22]. We have also observed a recovery of patients' immunological functions after two to three doses of DC vaccination [23]. Therefore, a viable possibility involves using allogeneic DCs for only the initial doses and then changing to more efficient vaccines prepared with autologous DCs.

Conclusion

We believe that the treatment of patients with prostate metastatic disease using immunotherapy based on DCs is feasible in highly genetically polymorphic populations. For a more efficient immune response, entire mRNA molecules should be used instead of small peptides because of the diversity of the HLA molecules found in these populations. Furthermore, vaccines for at least the first two doses should be prepared with allogeneic DCs since patient immune systems may be suppressed by the tumor. Then, periferic blood of patients could be collected to prepare vaccines containing patients' own HLA molecules.

Abbreviations

DC: 

Dendritic Cell, PSA, prostate-specific antigen.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Cristina O. Massoco for helpful assistance in cytometry. This work was funded by Genoa Biotechnology SA.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Oncocell Division, Genoa Biotechnology SA, Alameda Ministro Rocha Azevedo
(2)
Laboratório de Investigação Médica da Disciplina de Urologia da Faculdade de Medicina de USP-LIM 55

References

  1. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. [http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2006/]
  2. Ali AS, Hamdy FC: The spectrum of prostate cancer care: from curative intent to palliation. Curr Urol Rep. 2007, 8 (3): 245-52. 10.1007/s11934-007-0013-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Taplin ME: Biochemical (Prostate-Specific Antigen) Relapse: An Oncologist's Perspective. Rev Urol. 2003, 5 (Suppl 2): S3-S13.Google Scholar
  4. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC: Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999, 281 (17): 1642-5. 10.1001/jama.281.17.1591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadaschik BA, Gleave ME: Therapeutic options for hormone-refractory prostate cancer in 2007. Urol Oncol. 2007, 25: 413-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mosca PJ, Lyerly HK, Clay TM, Morse MA, Lyerly HK: Dendritic cell vaccines. Front Biosci. 2007, 12: 4050-60. 10.2741/2371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Osada T, Clay TM, Woo CY, Morse MA, Lyerly HK: Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy. Int Rev Immunol. 2006, 25 (5–6): 377-413. 10.1080/08830180600992456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilboa E: DC-based cancer vaccines. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117 (5): 1195-203. 10.1172/JCI31205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbuto JAM, Ensina LFC, Neves AR, Bergamini-Santos PC, Leite KRM, Marques R, Costa F, Martins SC, Câmara-Lopes LH, Buzaid AC: Dendritic cell-tumor hybrid vaccination for metastatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007, 53: 1111-18. 10.1007/s00262-004-0551-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Thomas-Kaskel AK, Waller CF, Schultze-Seemann W, Veelken H: Immunotherapy with dendritic cells for prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121 (3): 467-73. 10.1002/ijc.22859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boczkowski D, Nair SK, Nam JH, Lyerly HK, Gilboa E: Dendritic cells pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Med. 1996, 184: 465-72. 10.1084/jem.184.2.465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Banchereau J, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998, 392: 245-52. 10.1038/32588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Salgaller ML, Lodge PA, McLean JG, Tjoa BA, Loftus DJ, Ragde H, Kenny GM, Rogers M, Boynton AL, Murphy GP: Report of immune monitoring of prostate cancer patients undergoing T-cell therapy using dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific peptides from prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). Prostate. 1998, 35: 144-51. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19980501)35:2<144::AID-PROS8>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy GP, Tjoa BA, Simmons SJ, Jarisch J, Bowes VA, Ragde H, Rogers M, Elgamal A, Kenny GM, Cobb OE, Ireton RC, Troychak MJ, Salgaller ML, Boynton AL: Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen peptides: a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with hormone-refractory metastatic disease. Prostate. 1999, 38: 73-8. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19990101)38:1<73::AID-PROS9>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Callegari-Jacques SM, Grattapaglia D, Salzano FM, Salamoni SP, Crossetti SG, Ferreira ME, Hutz MH: Historical genetics: spatiotemporal analysis of the formation of the Brazilian population. Am J Hum Biol. 2003, 15: 824-34. 10.1002/ajhb.10217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Abe-Sandes K, Silva WA, Zago MA: Heterogeneity of the Y chromosome in Afro-Brazilian populations. Hum Biol. 2004, 76: 77-86. 10.1353/hub.2004.0014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Tendeloo VF, Ponsaerts P, Berneman ZN: mRNA-based gene transfer as a tool for gene and cell therapy. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2007, 9: 423-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heiser A, Coleman D, Dannull J, Yancey D, Maurice MA, Lallas CD, Dahm P, Niedzwiecki D, Gilboa E, Vieweg J: Autologous dendritic cells transfected with prostate-specific antigen RNA stimulate CTL responses against metastatic prostate tumors. J Clin Invest. 2002, 109: 409-17. 10.1172/JCI200214364.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Su Z, Dannull J, Yang BK, Dahm P, Coleman D, Yancey D, Sichi S, Niedzwiecki D, Boczkowski D, Gilboa E, Vieweg J: Telomerase mRNA-transfected Dendritic Cells stimulate antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Immunol. 2005, 174 (6): 3798-807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Scharenborg NM, Engelen LP, Ruiter DJ, Gerritsen MJ, Croockewit S, Britten CM, Torensma R, Adema GJ, Figdor CG, Punt CJ: Maturation of dendritic cells is a prerequisite for inducing immune responses in advanced melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (14): 5091-100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McIlroy D, Gregoire M: Optimizing dendritic cell-based anticancer immunotherapy: maturation state does have clinical impact. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003, 52: 583-91. 10.1007/s00262-003-0414-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tjoa BA, Simmons SJ, Bowes VA, Ragde H, Rogers M, Elgamal A, Kenny GM, Cobb OE, Ireton RC, Troychak MJ, Salgaller ML, Boynton AL, Murphy GP: Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides. Prostate. 1998, 36 (1): 39-44. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19980615)36:1<39::AID-PROS6>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Neves AR, Ensina LFC, Anselmo LB, Leite KRM, Buzaid AC, Camara-Lopes LH, Barbuto JAM: Dendritic cells derived from metastatic cancer patients vaccinated with allogeneic dendritic cell-autologous tumor cell hybrids express more CD86 and induce higher levels of interferon-gamma in mixed lymphocyte reactions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54: 61-66. 10.1007/s00262-004-0550-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sousa-Canavez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement