- Open Access
AAV2-mediated in vivo immune gene therapy of solid tumours
Genetic Vaccines and Therapyvolume 8, Article number: 8 (2010)
Many strategies have been adopted to unleash the potential of gene therapy for cancer, involving a wide range of therapeutic genes delivered by various methods. Immune therapy has become one of the major strategies adopted for cancer gene therapy and seeks to stimulate the immune system to target tumour antigens. In this study, the feasibility of AAV2 mediated immunotherapy of growing tumours was examined, in isolation and combined with anti-angiogenic therapy.
Immune-competent Balb/C or C57 mice bearing subcutaneous JBS fibrosarcoma or Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) tumour xenografts respectively were treated by intra-tumoural administration of AAV2 vector encoding the immune up-regulating cytokine granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and the co-stimulatory molecule B7-1 to subcutaneous tumours, either alone or in combination with intra-muscular (IM) delivery of AAV2 vector encoding Nk4 14 days prior to tumour induction. Tumour growth and survival was monitored for all animals. Cured animals were re-challenged with tumourigenic doses of the original tumour type. In vivo cytotoxicity assays were used to investigate establishment of cell-mediated responses in treated animals.
AAV2-mediated GM-CSF, B7-1 treatment resulted in a significant reduction in tumour growth and an increase in survival in both tumour models. Cured animals were resistant to re-challenge, and induction of T cell mediated anti-tumour responses were demonstrated. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes to naïve animals prevented tumour establishment. Systemic production of Nk4 induced by intra-muscular (IM) delivery of Nk4 significantly reduced subcutaneous tumour growth. However, combination of Nk4 treatment with GM-CSF, B7-1 therapy reduced the efficacy of the immune therapy.
Overall, this study demonstrates the potential for in vivo AAV2 mediated immune gene therapy, and provides data on the inter-relationship between tumour vasculature and immune cell recruitment.
Cancer cells are capable of evading regular immune responses for a number of reasons: they can secrete immunosuppressive factors , there can be down-regulation of antigen expression [2, 3] or of major histocompatability complex (MHC) molecules [4, 5] and also a lack of co-stimulation [6, 7]. With the advent of gene therapy as a tool for cancer treatment, immunotherapy-related approaches to stimulate immune responses against cancer cells include the transfer of immune stimulatory genes such as cytokines or costimulatory genes into cancer cells, enhancing antigen presentation through the manipulation of antigen presenting cells (APCs) and genetic vaccination against cancer cell-specific antigens [8, 9].
AAV has a number of properties that make it an ideal candidate as a gene delivery vector for the treatment of cancer. AAV elicits only mild host immune responses in vivo ; long term transgene expression can be achieved [11, 12] and also many of the therapeutic genes for cancer treatment fall within the size limit dictated for rAAV. While vectors derived from AAV have shown great promise in the course of research into treatment of numerous indications ranging from cystic fibrosis to haemophilia B [13, 14], only in recent years have they begun to be investigated in a cancer setting [15–18].
Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a cytokine that acts as a critical factor for development and differentiation of macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). Activation of T cells is enhanced by local GM-CSF mediated recruitment of DCs, allowing for the efficient uptake of antigens and presentation to T cells in the draining lymph node. Co-stimulatory molecules are essential for correct T cell activation and subsequent differentiation into effector T cells following their interaction with antigen presenting cells (APCs). The initial signal for activation is dependent on specific T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of the antigen presented by MHC molecules on APC. The second signal is delivered through the binding of co-stimulatory molecules expressed on the APC surface with their ligands on T cells. A lack of co-stimulatory signals allows tumour cells to induce antigen specific tolerance or anergy on the basis of MHC class I restricted presentation [19, 20]. The CD28 receptor has been identified as one of the most important costimulatory receptors on T cells. The ligands for this receptor are members of the B7 family and include B7-1 (CD80) [21, 22]. B7-1-transduced tumour cells are expected to present both the antigen and the co-stimulatory (CD28-mediated) signals to CD8+ CTL simultaneously, leading to efficient activation of CTLs without requiring the assistance of CD4+ helper T cells. Transfection/transduction with B7-1 has resulted in tumour cell rejection in several tumour models [19, 23–26]. Studies have also demonstrated that cells modified to express GM-CSF or B7-1 can be used to induce protective, T cell-mediated immune responses. Different approaches have been taken for the modification of cells, including both ex vivo viral transduction of leukaemia cells  and non-viral delivery of the genes on plasmids to growing tumours .
For effective cytotoxic responses, in addition to effective education/priming of the immune system to tumour antigens, the local tumour environment must permit immune cell infiltration. Angiogenesis is the formation of new capillary blood vessels from existing microvessels which occurs in physiological and pathological states . This process is controlled by numerous angiogenic factors that are able to attract endothelial cells from the surrounding tissues and represents a crucial stage in tumour growth and metastasis [29, 30]. For cancer therapy, strategies based on the manipulation of angiogenesis are referred to as anti-angiogenic strategies and seek to prevent new vessel formation or to inactivate pre-existing vessels. Although angiogenesis is a discrete component of the tumour phenotype, it is often neglected by tumour immunologists. However, lymphocyte extravasation is tightly controlled by blood vessels and requires orchestration of multiple receptor-ligand interactions as well a favourable cytokine/chemokine micromilieu . Moreover, ongoing angiogenesis induces profound morphological and molecular changes in tumour blood vessels and may thus contribute significantly to the tumour's intrinsic resistance to infiltration by immune cells. Therefore, effective tumour immune strategies require both fully armed effector cells and a tumour environment permissive for infiltration and destruction.
The invasive and metastatic behaviour of tumour cells is regulated by extracellular growth factors like hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which is a ligand for the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase [32, 33]. HGF is a heterodimeric molecule and functions of HGF include mitogenic, motogenic, morphogenic and anti-apoptotic activities [34, 35]. In cancer, HGF stimulates malignant cell invasion behaviour through its binding to c-Met [32, 33, 36]. Nk4 (also known as IL32b) inhibits HGF-c-Met signalling and therefore tumour metastasis [36, 37]. Nk4 also has an additional, independent function, promoting anti-angiogenic activities. This is achieved due to the make up of Nk4, which consists of the N-terminus of HGF, containing an N-terminal hairpin and four kringle domains (well described anti-angiogenic molecules) [38–41]. Nk4 augments anti-angiogenic activities through the competitive inhibition of binding of angiogenic growth factors such as VEGF, bFGF and HGF to endothelial cells by its N-terminus [36, 42, 43]. Angiogenesis-inhibitory as well as cancer-specific apoptosis inducing effects make the Nk4 gene an attractive candidate for gene therapy of cancer.
The aim of this study was to assess AAV2 mediated delivery of the immune stimulating genes GM-CSF and B7-1 and Nk4 on different tumour models in vivo. Since immunotherapy has the potential to recruit a systemic immune response against tumour cells, and Nk4 treatment is known to inhibit angiogenesis and metastatic spread, a combination of these therapies may improve or replace traditional treatments currently available.
Materials and methods
pAAV2-MCS (Stratagene) was used to generate reporter and therapeutic vectors and for the generation of AAV control particles. The mammalian expression vector pVivo1 was purchased from Invivogen (Cayla SAS, Toulouse, France). A version of this plasmid, designated pVivoGMCSF, B7-1, containing the murine GM-CSF and murine B7-1 genes transcriptionally controlled from two human glucose regulated protein (GRP) promoters GRP94 and hamster GRP78 promoters respectively was designed and cloning was performed on contract by Invivogen. An AAV plasmid encoding the GM-CSF, B7-1 expression cassette (pAAV2-GB) was constructed by excising the expression cassette from pVivoGMCSF, B7-1 using SspI and NheI and cloning the Klenow treated fragment into NcoI and XbaI sites of pAAV-MCS plasmid (Klenow treated). Inserts were confirmed by sequencing (MWG Biotech). The AAV2-Luc, AAV2-Nk4 and AAV-BB constructs have previously been described . All constructs used in this study are illustrated in Figure 1.
Recombinant AAV2 vectors (rAAV), AAV2-MCS, AAV2-GB, AAV2-Nk4, AAV2-BB and AAV2-Luc were generated using the AAV Helper-Free System (Stratagene, Agilent, Dublin). rAAV particles were purified using the Virakit AAV Purification Kit (Virapur, San Diego, USA) per manufacturer's instructions. Purified AAV2-GB particles were used to transduce HT1080 cells and FACS analysis for B7-1 expression employed to determine the number of transducing units (TU). Purified AAV2-MCS, AAV2-Nk4, AAV2-BB and AAV2-Luc preparations were titrated using real time PCR to determine the number of genome copies, using primers specific for the CMV promoter (forward: 5' aaatgggcggtaggcgtgta 3', reverse: 5' gatcggtcccggtgtcttct 3') and were synthesized by MWG Biotech, Germany. A fragment of length 124 bp is expected.
Cell lines and tissue culture
Murine JBS fibrosarcoma tumour cells  and murine Lewis Lung Carcinoma cells were maintained in culture at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, in Dulbecco's Modified Essential Medium (GIBCO, Invitrogen Corp., Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 10% iron-supplemented donor calf serum (Sigma Aldrich Ireland, Ireland), 300 μg/ml L-glutamine. Cell densities were determined by visual count using a haemocytometer. Cell viability was confirmed by Trypan Blue Dye Exclusion (Sigma Aldrich Ireland, Ireland) to be > 95% for tumour induction. Human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells were maintained in culture at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, in Eagle Minimum Essential Medium (GIBCO, Invitrogen Corp., Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 10% iron-supplemented donor calf serum (Sigma Aldrich Ireland, Ireland), 300 μg/ml L-glutamine.
In vitro transduction
Cells were seeded in a 12-well plate (HT1080 at 2 × 105, JBS at 5 × 104 cells per well, LLC at 1.5 × 105 cells per well) in complete medium 24 h before transduction. On the day of transduction, cells were 80% confluent. 9 × 108 genome copies (GC) of AAV2-Luc or 7 × 105 transducing units (TU) of AAV2-GB in a 0.5 ml volume of transduction medium (DMEM, 2% FBS) were added to individual wells. The plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C, 5% CO2 with gentle rocking at 30 min intervals during the incubation. 0.5 ml post infection medium (DMEM, 18% FBS) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for a further 24 h.
Flow-cytometric analysis and ELISA of transduced cells
Cell surface expression of B7-1 was detected by flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) with CD80-specific antibody, clone L307.4 (BD Biosciences UK Ltd, Oxford, UK). Briefly AAV2-GB transduced and mock-infected cells were harvested 48 h post transduction. The cells were labelled with the CD80-specific antibody, an isotype control antibody F (ab') 2 Goat Anti Rat IgG: RPe Mouse ADS (Serotec) or unlabeled. 10,000 events were acquired and analyzed for PE fluorescence. PE was measured on the FL2-channel (short band pass 575 nm filter) and plotted against side scatter. Cells without a conjugated antibody and cells with an irrelevant antibody conjugated antibody were used as controls, thereby correcting for background fluorescence.
Production of GM-CSF from JBS cells was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Quantikine Mouse GM-CSF Immunoassay R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). For quantification of GM-CSF production in transduced cells, AAV2-GB transduced and untransduced cell supernatant was harvested 48 h post transduction and the assay was carried out as per the manufacturer's protocol.
Animals and tumour induction
Mice were obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Oxfordshire, England), and kept at a constant room temperature (22°C) with a natural day/night light cycle in a conventional animal colony. Standard laboratory food and water were provided ad libitum. Before experiments, mice were afforded an adaptation period of at least 14 days. Female Balb/C or C57Bl/6 mice in good condition, without fungal or other infections, weighing 16-22 g and of 6-8 weeks of age, were included in experiments. For routine tumour induction, 2 × 106 JBS cells or 5 × 105 LLC cells suspended in 100 μl of serum free DMEM or were injected subcutaneously (SC) into the flank. Following tumour establishment, tumours were allowed develop and monitored mostly by alternate day measurements in two dimensions using a Verniers Callipers. Tumour volume was calculated according to the formula V = ab2 Π/6, where a, is the longest diameter of the tumour and b is the longest diameter perpendicular to diameter a. From these volumes, tumour growth curves were constructed. In cases of successful treatment, 100 days with no recurrence was considered a cure. In the case of recurrence, the animal was considered incurable and humanely euthanized when the tumour diameter was between 1.5 - 2 cm. Survival time extended from the time of first treatment to 100 days (successful treatments) or to sacrifice (recurrences).
In vivo gene delivery
All animal experiments were approved by the ethics committee of University College Cork. Mice were randomly divided into experimental groups and subjected to specific experimental protocols. For tumour experiments, mice were treated as soon as the tumour could be reliably injected (tumour diameter = 0.4 cm on average). For quadriceps muscle experiments, a single intramuscular injection was carried out into the right or left thigh of the animal. Mice were anaesthetized during all treatments by intraperitoneal (IP) administration of 200 μg xylazine and 2 mg ketamine. Viral vector particles were administered by direct intratumoural (IT) or intramuscular injection (IM) in a volume of 50 μl 2 × 108 - 2 × 109 GC of replication incompetent recombinant AAV2 particles.
In vivo confirmation of Nk4 gene delivery and expression
Muscle tissue from animals treated by IM injection of AAV2-Nk4 and untreated animals was excised at day 3. The muscle tissue was passed through a nylon membrane in order to disassociate the tissue and create a single cell suspension. The cells were precipitated by centrifugation, the DNA and RNA was simultaneously extracted from the cell pellet using the Qiagen Allprep DNA/RNA kit as per the manufacturers protocol. DNA and RNA concentration was determined using the nanodrop. AAV mediated delivery was confirmed by PCR and AAV mediated gene expression was confirmed by rtPCR. The primers were against the Nk4 sequence Forward: 5'CCTCTCTGATGACATGAAGAAG 3', Reverse: 5'TGTCACAAAAGCTCTCCCC 3'. PCR conditions were as follows HotstarTaq Activation 95°C-15 min, Denaturation 94°C-1 min, Annealing 59°C -1 min, Elongation 72°C-1 min. Nk4 DNA was detected by PCR in 50 ng of DNA using HotstarTaq Master Mix Kit (Qiagen) in a Mastercycler (Eppendorf,, UK) PCR machine. The PCR products were visualised on a 1% agarose gel. Nk4 expression of transduced muscle was confirmed by rtPCR. Extracted RNA was DNAse treated using Ambion DNAfree kit according to manufacturer's instructions. RNA concentration was determined using the nanodrop. Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen) was used to generate cDNA from 100 ng of total RNA in a 20 μl volume according to manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was diluted to a final volume of 50 μl following cDNA synthesis using DNasefree H2O. 5 μl diluted cDNA was PCR amplified using HotstarTaq Master Mix Kit (Qiagen) in a Mastercycler (Eppendorf, UK) PCR machine. The PCR products were then visualised on a 1% agarose gel.
For in vitro experiments, treated cells were analysed for luciferase activity 48 h post transduction using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega MSC, Dublin), as per manufacturer's instructions. Luminescence was measured using the IVIS Imaging System (Xenogen, UK). In vivo luciferase activity from tissues was analysed post- transduction as follows: 80 μl of 30 mg/ml firefly luciferin (Biosynth, Basil, Switzerland) was injected intraperitoneally (IP) and intratumourally (IT). Mice were anaesthetised as before. Ten minutes post-luciferin injection, live anaesthetised mice were imaged for 3 min at high sensitivity using the IVIS imaging system (Xenogen, UK).
In vivo cytotoxicity assay
The development of an immune-mediated anti-tumoural activity following treatment was tested by in vivo cytotoxicity assay . The Winn assay was utilised as follows: mice (six/group) received injections of a mixture of JBS cells and splenocytes from either AAV2-GB cured mice or naive mice. Splenocytes were taken 100 days post tumour regression from 'cured' mice for use in Winn assays. Splenocytes were mixed with tumour cells and injected SC in a proportion of 50:1 (108 spleen cells to 2 × 106 JBS cells). Mice were then monitored on alternate days for tumour development.
The primary outcome variable of the statistical analyses was the tumour volume in each mouse measured at each time point. The principal explanatory variables were the different treatment groups. Tumour volume was analyzed as continuous. Treatment groups were analyzed as categorical variables. At each time point, a two-sampled t-test was used to compare mean tumour volume within each treatment group depending on the number of groups being compared. Microsoft Excel 11.0 (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism Version 4.0 (GraphPad Prism Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) were used to manage and analyze data. Statistical significance was defined at the standard 5% level. Survival was analysed using a two-sampled Student's t-test assuming equal variances to compare the average number of days survived per group.
Validation of vector constructs and gene expression
Flow Cytometric analysis of cell surface expression of B7-1 and ELISA for GM-CSF confirmed the functionality of AAV2-GB particles in vitro. The human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cell line was used, being the standard cell line for AAV transduction assays. HT1080 cells were transduced with AAV2-GB or mock transduced with PBS. After 48 h, cells and supernatant were harvested for assays. Cells were labelled with anti-CD80 antibody, and the resulting overlay graph (Figure 2a) demonstrated an increase of 38.2% in B7-1 expression in transduced cells (light grey overlay peak) in comparison cells labelled with an isotype (dark grey peak). GM-CSF protein was detected in cell culture supernatant in cells transduced with AAV2-GB at a level of 250 pg/ml and not in mock-infected cells (Figure 2b).
The efficiency of AAV2 mediated transduction of each of the test cell lines was determined in cells transduced with either AAV2-GB or AAV2-Luc particles. FACS analysis for cell surface expression of B7-1 confirmed transduction of both JBS (Figure 2c) and LLC (Figure 2d). These graphs demonstrate that JBS cells (13.4% increase) are more permissive to transduction with AAV2 than LLC cells (4.25% increase). Also evident from these data is that there is a low level of endogenous cell surface B7-1 expression in untreated LLC cells, which has also been reported by other groups . A lower level of background B7-1 expression was observed in JBS cells.
The efficiency of AAV2 mediated transduction of growing JBS and LLC tumours was also assessed. AAV2-Luc was administered IT to SC tumours and luciferase expression assessed using the IVIS system on day 7-post administration. Luminescence was detected in JBS tumours in Balb/C mice at 9.7 × 10-1 p/sec/cm2/sr/gene copy administered (Figure 2g) and in LLC tumours in C57Bl/6 mice at 1.64 × 10-8 p/sec/cm2/sr/gene copy administered (Figure 2g). In order to confirm transgene expression from AAV2-GB transduced tumours in vivo, LLC tumours were excised 7 days after IT delivery of AAV2-GB or PBS. Cell surface expression of B7-1 was detected by flow cytometry as previously described. Results indicated that administration of AAV2-GB resulted in an increase in cell surface B7-1 expression. A background level of B7-1 expression of approximately 10% was seen in PBS treated LLC cells while a 5.2% (+/- 1.48) increase in B7-1 positive cells was observed in AAV2-GB transduced LLC cells (Figure 2f).
AAV mediated immune gene therapy of tumours in vivo
The AAV2-GB construct was used to deliver GM-CSF and B7-1 to JBS or LLC tumours. The JBS study consisted of three groups (n = 5): an AAV2-GB treated group, an AAV2 null vector treated group (AAV2-Luc vector), and an untreated group. The tumour growth curve (Figure 3a) illustrates a significant decrease in tumour growth rate in those groups treated with AAV particles expressing GM-CSF and B7-1 genes in comparison with untreated and null vector treatment groups. There was a significant reduction in tumour growth on day 21 between the AAV2-GB treated group and the null vector treatment group (p = 0.028), confirming that tumour regression involved the therapeutic genes encoded by the particles and was not due to a response to the particle alone. The survival curve (Figure 3b) illustrates a significant increase in survival for all mice treated with GM-CSF, B7-1 in comparison with the untreated controls (p < 0.0008). The treatment resulted in a cure for 60% of the treated animals.
The LLC study consisted of three groups (n = 6): an untreated control group, an AAV null vector (AAV2-BB) group and an AAV2-GB treated group. The tumour growth curve (Figure 3c) illustrates a marked decrease in tumour growth in the AAV2-GB treated group in comparison with the untreated and null vector controls. The reduction in tumour growth was significant on days 20 - 27 (p < 0.02) between AAV2-GB treated mice and both the untreated and null vector groups. There was no significant difference between the untreated and the null vector groups. The survival curve (Figure 3d) illustrated a significant increase in survival in animals treated with GM-CSF, B7-1 in comparison with the untreated and null vector groups. Although the increase in survival was significant (p = 0.008), the therapy did not result in cure in any of the treated animals.
Immunological memory following tumour treatment
In cases where complete tumour regression occurred (60% JBS treated mice), 'cured' mice were rechallenged to assess for sustained anti-tumoural immunological responses. Mice were injected SC on the opposite flank to the original tumour challenge, with tumourigenic doses of the same tumour type (JBS) 30 days following tumour regression. AAV2-GB 'cured' mice remained tumour free to 100 days whilst all naïve mice developed tumours and were culled due to tumour burden by day 28 (Figure 3e), indicating immunological memory to tumour antigens.
In order to examine for a cell-mediated immune response as a result of AAV2-GB treatment, the cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes from treated mice was examined in vivo using a modified Winn assay . Groups of mice received injections of a mixture of a tumourigenic dose of JBS cells and splenocytes from either AAV2-GB cured mice or naïve mice. All mice receiving splenocytes from 'cured' mice failed to grow tumours, while JBS tumours developed in all control animals receiving splenocytes from naïve mice (Figure 3f), indicating adoptive transfer to naïve mice of anti-tumour lymphocytes conferring resistance to further tumour challenge.
Nk4 therapy of growing subcutaneous LLC tumours
AAV2 vector mediated transgene expression is known to be delayed initially before increasing over time [47–49]. Given the short therapeutic window available with the fast growing LLC tumour model, and since the Nk4 transgene product is secreted by transduced cells, we opted to administer AAV2-Nk4 prior to tumour induction, to quadriceps muscle, with the aim of producing systemic circulating Nk4 protein. The temporal pattern of AAV2-mediated expression from quadriceps was examined using AAV2-Luc (Figure 4a). Expression was observed to increase up to day 14 and remain higher thereafter.
For tumour experiments, quadriceps muscles were transduced with AAV2-Nk4 14 days prior to LLC tumour induction and tumour growth monitored on alternate days (Figure 4c). Nk4 delivery and expression was confirmed by PCR (Figure 4b). For animals treated with AAV2-Nk4 there was a significant reduction in tumour growth compared with the untreated group (p = 0.048 on day 20), although this significance was not seen when compared with the null vector treated group. The Kaplan-Meier curve (Figure 4d) illustrates an increase in survival in animals treated with Nk4, although not reaching statistical significance in comparison with the untreated (p = 0.06) or null vector groups (p = 0.26).
Combination of immune and anti-angiogenic therapies
In an effort to enhance both the immune and Nk4 protocols, a combined therapy was examined. The study consisted of 5 groups: an IT AAV2-GB/IM AAV2-BB treated group, an IT AAV2-MCS/IM AAV2-Nk4 treated group, a combined IT AAV2-GB/IM AAV2-Nk4 treated group, an IT AAV2-MCS/IM AAV2-BB treated group (null vector), and an untreated group. The tumour growth curve (Figure 4e) again illustrates a marked decrease in tumour growth in groups treated with AAV expressing GM-CSF, B7-1 or Nk4 genes alone in comparison with the untreated and null vector groups. However, treatment with AAV2-Nk4 prior to immune therapy, eliminated the anti-tumour effects of AAV2-GB treatment (Figure 4e), with tumour growth in this group similar to controls (p vs. untreated p = 0.52, p vs. null vector control p = 0.38).
Though certain viral vectors can elicit strong immune responses and systemic toxicity , gene transduction efficiency is extremely high. While non-viral delivery of plasmid DNA displays lower toxicity, a major obstacle that has prevented its widespread application is its relative inefficiency in gene transfection . The construct used in this study encoded GM-CSF and B7-1, and was designed such that GM-CSF would be secreted from the tumour cell with B7-1 expressed on the cell surface in an effort to elicit an anti-tumour immune response. We have previously demonstrated that non-viral delivery of these immune genes on a plasmid to JBS tumours leads to immune stimulation and consequent eradication of the treated tumour and associated metastases, when delivered by electroporation [28, 52] or sonoporation .
Other work from our laboratory has shown that AAV2 mediated reporter gene expression in JBS tumours is significantly higher and more sustained than plasmid-mediated delivery. We decided to examine if the anti-tumour efficacy of GM-CSF, B7-1 could be improved by AAV2 delivery. The results achieved here were comparable with those observed with both non-viral strategies, suggesting that levels of immune gene expression may not be the limiting factor in recruitment of anti-tumour responses. However, it should be noted that a different temporal pattern of transgene expression is observed with AAV and plasmid vectors. Gene expression from plasmid vector is maximal 24 - 48 h post transfection, while AAV2 related transcription is delayed, taking 4 - 7 days to surpass plasmid levels. Given the relatively short window of therapeutic opportunity permitted by the murine tumour models used here, it is plausible that superior effects might be observed in clinical situations, where patient tumour growth is slower, thereby facilitating AAV vector transcription levels to reach full capacity [8, 47–49]. Also, the range of patient tumour locations and sizes amenable to AAV vector administration is far wider than is practical for delivery involving electroporation or sonoporation equipment, which are currently useful only for accessible subcutaneous tumours. Furthermore, the potential for specific transduction of tumour cells following systemic administration of viruses has been validated, involving the inclusion of tumour specific targeting ligands to viral vector surfaces [54, 55].
Our studies demonstrated that the observed tumour reductions were immune mediated, and that the immune response induced was, at least in part, T cell mediated. Adoptive transfer of the anti-tumour immune response to naïve animals prevented tumour establishment. The immune gene therapy was less effective in LLC than JBS and this might be attributed to a number of different reasons. Both of the tumour cell lines can be described as weakly or non-immunogenic. The JBS murine fibrosarcoma is derived from the 3T3 cell line and is described previously . JBS grows in immunocompetent Balb/C at the same rate as in athymic mice, and vaccination strategies, using a diversity of approaches, schedules and cell treatments, failed to protect Balb/C mice from subsequent tumourogenic JBS challenges [28, 56]. The well characterised LLC cell line has previously been shown to be weakly or non-immunogenic, with a number of approaches such as UV irradiation  or viral infection  being used to increase their immunogenicity in previous studies. As demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo, AAV2 transduces JBS cells more efficiently than LLC. The AAV2/2 serotype used in our studies has a reported 30% efficiency of transducing LLC in vitro . We observed an even lower efficiency (data not shown). Different serotypes such as AAV2/5 have a 65% transduction efficiency in LLC . Also, as demonstrated here, LLC cells have an endogenous B7-1 expression. It is possible that low level B7-1 expression following transduction with AAV-GB in LLC cells could result in preferential binding of B7-1 to CTLA-4 on Treg cells rather than CD80 on effector cells resulting in a subsequent tumour growth advantage, as demonstrated by Tirapu et al . However, such an effect was not apparent in our studies, with the moderate increase in CD80 expression combined with GM-CSF through gene transduction sufficient to significantly reduce tumour growth. An increase in cell surface B7-1 expression breaks the immune tolerance allowing B7-1 to bind preferentially to its main receptor CD28 on antigen presenting cells (rather than Treg) creating an anti-tumour response. We have previously demonstrated that simultaneous depletion of Treg further improves immune therapy .
For both tumour types examined here, it is plausible that a minimal threshold of the percentage of tumour cells expressing GM-CSF and B7-1 is necessary for this system to effect complete tumour regression. Intratumoural distribution of transduced cells could also be important. In AAV2 treatment, it is likely that a large portion of the tumour is untransduced, as the transduction region is limited to the needle track. In an attempt to maximise transduction efficiency, we used multiple injections of AAV2 vector in an attempt to saturate the tumour with vector solution. This notwithstanding, it is unlikely that there is a requirement for transduction of every tumour cell, as the mechanism of tumour regression is immune mediated, whereby targeting of non-transduced tumour cells is achieved after the gene therapy induced immune sensitisation.
Due to the nature of the AAV2-Nk4 construct, a null vector that encoded the blastocidin antibiotic resistance gene was used as a control. In contrast, the AAV2-GB construct includes no extra coding sequences. In this case, the control vector/s used included the AAV2-MCS or AAV2-Luc. Firefly luciferase is generally accepted to be non-immunogenic , and was used here for monitoring of vector-mediated expression in tumours during experiments. Specifically in relation to JBS tumours, growth curves also illustrate that there is a moderate, but statistically insignificant reduction in tumour growth for those tumours treated with the null vector (AAV2-Luc) in comparison with the untreated group. No such tumour reduction in tumour growth was seen in LLC tumours treated with the null vector (AAV2-BB) in comparison with the untreated LLC group.
In this study, we also assessed the effects on tumour growth of combining anti-angiogenic treatment with immune gene therapy. The process of angiogenesis provides an ideal target for treatment, has been studied extensively and anti-angiogenic agents are in clinical use . Solid tumours create a unique microenvironment, featuring chaotic vasculature, resulting in zones of tumour ischaemia and poor intratumoural circulation, which can prevent immune cell access [31, 63–65]. In recent years, evidence is accumulating that the immune and vascular environments are closely linked. Several studies have indicated that vascular components of the tumour stroma are targeted during immune-mediated tumour rejection . Furthermore, recent reports indicate that certain anti-angiogenic therapies, rather than eliminating vasculature in the tumour and 'starving' cells, serve to normalise microcirculatory function, permitting access to the tumour for immune cells . By developing a deeper understanding of the activity in vivo of various anti-angiogenic agents, new improved therapeutic regimes may be developed by addressing simultaneous anti-angiogenic activity and immune up-regulation, with more therapeutic potential than either therapeutic approach alone. We have previously shown that IT administered AAV2-Nk4 did not significantly reduce SC LLC tumour growth . In the current study, systemic production of Nk4 induced prior to tumour establishment provided superior anti-tumour immune responses to IT delivery, with a reduction in tumour burden and an increase in survival in AAV-Nk4 treated animals, although differences were not statistically significant. However, the combination studies described here showed that Nk4 therapy eliminated the efficacy of the immune therapy. In our experiments involving prior expression of anti-angiogenic agent, it is possible that Nk4 mediated reduction in tumour neovasculature may act as an obstacle to immune therapy by preventing migration of immune effector cells into established tumour parenchyma [31, 64, 65]. The schedule and timing of combined treatment may be key in achieving improved responses with such an approach. In addition, since Nk4 is a multifunctional molecule, we cannot rule out the possibility that its activity other than anti-angiogenic, might play a role in the observed responses. The design of the experiment addressed the possibility that pre-exposure to the first AAV vector IM precluded gene transfer with the IT vector one week later due to any potential immune response to the vector. The experimental group that received AAV2-GB IT also received AAV-BB IM one week previously, and a significant reduction in tumour growth was still observed, ruling out an immune reaction to AAV preventing expression of the immune genes. Furthermore, as indicated in Figure 4a, IM delivery of AAV2-Luc resulted in long-term gene expression indicating the absence of immune responses to AAV-transduced muscle cells.
Much study is required with respect to elucidating the complex cascade of events that is needed to reduce angiogenesis while permitting effector cell entry into tumours. Researching these mechanisms will enable cancer biologists to specifically target the tumour environment and further improve therapeutic efficacies. Together with overcoming the obstacle of inefficient effector cell generation in cancer patients, 'angio-immuno' therapy may provide new opportunities to permit tumour infiltration and destruction. Exploiting the benefits of gene therapy, especially utilising viral vectors such as AAV, in terms of local activity and duration of therapeutic activity, may overcome current obstacles to successful cancer treatment with systemically administered drugs.
Cochran AJ, Morton DL, Stern S, Lana AM, Essner R, Wen DR: Sentinel lymph nodes show profound downregulation of antigen-presenting cells of the paracortex: implications for tumor biology and treatment. Mod Pathol. 2001, 14: 604-608. 10.1038/modpathol.3880358.
Kurnick JT, Ramirez-Montagut T, Boyle LA, Andrews DM, Pandolfi F, Durda PJ, Butera D, Dunn IS, Benson EM, Gobin SJ, van den Elsen PJ: A novel autocrine pathway of tumor escape from immune recognition: melanoma cell lines produce a soluble protein that diminishes expression of the gene encoding the melanocyte lineage melan-A/MART-1 antigen through down-modulation of its promoter. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 1204-1211.
Uyttenhove C, Maryanski J, Boon T: Escape of mouse mastocytoma P815 after nearly complete rejection is due to antigen-loss variants rather than immunosuppression. J Exp Med. 1983, 157: 1040-1052. 10.1084/jem.157.3.1040.
Cabrera CM, Jimenez P, Cabrera T, Esparza C, Ruiz-Cabello F, Garrido F: Total loss of MHC class I in colorectal tumors can be explained by two molecular pathways: beta2-microglobulin inactivation in MSI-positive tumors and LMP7/TAP2 downregulation in MSI-negative tumors. Tissue Antigens. 2003, 61: 211-219. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00020.x.
Hui K, Grosveld F, Festenstein H: Rejection of transplantable AKR leukaemia cells following MHC DNA-mediated cell transformation. Nature. 1984, 311: 750-752. 10.1038/311750a0.
Galea-Lauri J, Farzaneh F, Gaken J: Novel costimulators in the immune gene therapy of cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 1996, 3: 202-214.
Pardoll DM: Cancer vaccines. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 525-531. 10.1038/nm0598supp-525.
Collins SA, Guinn BA, Harrison PT, Scallan MF, O'Sullivan GC, Tangney M: Viral vectors in cancer immunotherapy: which vector for which strategy?. Curr Gene Ther. 2008, 8: 66-78. 10.2174/156652308784049345.
Tangney M, Casey G, Larkin JO, Collins CG, Soden D, Cashman J, Whelan MC, O'Sullivan GC: Non-viral in vivo immune gene therapy of cancer: combined strategies for treatment of systemic disease. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006, 55: 1443-1450. 10.1007/s00262-006-0169-z.
Zaiss AK, Muruve DA: Immunity to adeno-associated virus vectors in animals and humans: a continued challenge. Gene Ther. 2008, 15: 808-816. 10.1038/gt.2008.54.
Herzog RW, Yang EY, Couto LB, Hagstrom JN, Elwell D, Fields PA, Burton M, Bellinger DA, Read MS, Brinkhous KM, et al: Long-term correction of canine hemophilia B by gene transfer of blood coagulation factor IX mediated by adeno-associated viral vector. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 56-63. 10.1038/4743.
Wang L, Takabe K, Bidlingmaier SM, Ill CR, Verma IM: Sustained correction of bleeding disorder in hemophilia B mice by gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 3906-3910. 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3906.
Kay MA, Manno CS, Ragni MV, Larson PJ, Couto LB, McClelland A, Glader B, Chew AJ, Tai SJ, Herzog RW, et al: Evidence for gene transfer and expression of factor IX in haemophilia B patients treated with an AAV vector. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 257-261. 10.1038/73464.
Aitken ML, Moss RB, Waltz DA, Dovey ME, Tonelli MR, McNamara SC, Gibson RL, Ramsey BW, Carter BJ, Reynolds TC: A phase I study of aerosolized administration of tgAAVCF to cystic fibrosis subjects with mild lung disease. Hum Gene Ther. 2001, 12: 1907-1916. 10.1089/104303401753153956.
Li C, Bowles DE, van Dyke T, Samulski RJ: Adeno-associated virus vectors: potential applications for cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2005, 12: 913-925. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700876.
Mohr A, Henderson G, Dudus L, Herr I, Kuerschner T, Debatin KM, Weiher H, Fisher KJ, Zwacka RM: AAV-encoded expression of TRAIL in experimental human colorectal cancer leads to tumor regression. Gene Ther. 2004, 11: 534-543. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302154.
Shih CS, Laurie N, Holzmacher J, Spence Y, Nathwani AC, Davidoff AM, Dyer MA: AAV-mediated local delivery of interferon-beta for the treatment of retinoblastoma in preclinical models. Neuromolecular Med. 2009, 11: 43-52. 10.1007/s12017-009-8059-0.
Watanabe M, Boyer JL, Crystal RG: AAVrh.10-mediated genetic delivery of bevacizumab to the pleura to provide local anti-VEGF to suppress growth of metastatic lung tumors. Gene Ther. 2010, 17: 1042-1051. 10.1038/gt.2010.87.
Ramarathinam L, Castle M, Wu Y, Liu Y: T cell costimulation by B7/BB1 induces CD8 T cell-dependent tumor rejection: an important role of B7/BB1 in the induction, recruitment, and effector function of antitumor T cells. J Exp Med. 1994, 179: 1205-1214. 10.1084/jem.179.4.1205.
Borrello I, Pardoll D: GM-CSF-based cellular vaccines: a review of the clinical experience. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13: 185-193. 10.1016/S1359-6101(01)00034-X.
Linsley PS, Clark EA, Ledbetter JA: T-cell antigen CD28 mediates adhesion with B cells by interacting with activation antigen B7/BB-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 5031-5035. 10.1073/pnas.87.13.5031.
Linsley PS, Bradshaw J, Urnes M, Grosmaire L, Ledbetter JA: CD28 engagement by B7/BB-1 induces transient down-regulation of CD28 synthesis and prolonged unresponsiveness to CD28 signaling. J Immunol. 1993, 150: 3161-3169.
Chen L, Ashe S, Brady WA, Hellstrom I, Hellstrom KE, Ledbetter JA, McGowan P, Linsley PS: Costimulation of antitumor immunity by the B7 counterreceptor for the T lymphocyte molecules CD28 and CTLA-4. Cell. 1992, 71: 1093-1102. 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80059-5.
Chen L, McGowan P, Ashe S, Johnston J, Li Y, Hellstrom I, Hellstrom KE: Tumor immunogenicity determines the effect of B7 costimulation on T cell-mediated tumor immunity. J Exp Med. 1994, 179: 523-532. 10.1084/jem.179.2.523.
Townsend SE, Su FW, Atherton JM, Allison JP: Specificity and longevity of antitumor immune responses induced by B7-transfected tumors. Cancer Res. 1994, 54: 6477-6483.
Isaka Y, Nakamura H, Mizui M, Takabatake Y, Horio M, Kawachi H, Shimizu F, Imai E, Hori M: DNAzyme for TGF-beta suppressed extracellular matrix accumulation in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2004, 66: 586-590. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00777.x.
Stripecke R, Cardoso AA, Pepper KA, Skelton DC, Yu XJ, Mascarenhas L, Weinberg KI, Nadler LM, Kohn DB: Lentiviral vectors for efficient delivery of CD80 and granulocyte-macrophage- colony-stimulating factor in human acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia cells to induce antileukemic immune responses. Blood. 2000, 96: 1317-1326.
Collins CG, Tangney M, Larkin JO, Casey G, Whelan MC, Cashman J, Murphy J, Soden D, Vejda S, McKenna S, et al: Local gene therapy of solid tumors with GM-CSF and B7-1 eradicates both treated and distal tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006, 13: 1061-1071. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700976.
Malecki M, Kolsut P, Proczka R: Angiogenic and antiangiogenic gene therapy. Gene Ther. 2005, 12 (Suppl 1): S159-169. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302621.
Holleb AI, Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis. CA Cancer J Clin. 1972, 22: 226-229. 10.3322/canjclin.22.4.226.
Ganss R, Arnold B, Hammerling GJ: Mini-review: overcoming tumor-intrinsic resistance to immune effector function. Eur J Immunol. 2004, 34: 2635-2641. 10.1002/eji.200425474.
Vande Woude GF, Jeffers M, Cortner J, Alvord G, Tsarfaty I, Resau J: Met-HGF/SF: tumorigenesis, invasion and metastasis. Ciba Found Symp. 1997, 212: 119-130. discussion 130-112, 148-154
Jiang W, Hiscox S, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T: Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, its molecular, cellular and clinical implications in cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999, 29: 209-248. 10.1016/S1040-8428(98)00019-5.
Matsumoto K, Nakamura T: Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) as a tissue organizer for organogenesis and regeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 239: 639-644. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7517.
Birchmeier C, Gherardi E: Developmental roles of HGF/SF and its receptor, the c-Met tyrosine kinase. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8: 404-410. 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01359-2.
Matsumoto K, Nakamura T: NK4 (HGF-antagonist/angiogenesis inhibitor) in cancer biology and therapeutics. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94: 321-327. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01440.x.
Date K, Matsumoto K, Shimura H, Tanaka M, Nakamura T: HGF/NK4 is a specific antagonist for pleiotrophic actions of hepatocyte growth factor. FEBS Lett. 1997, 420: 1-6. 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01475-0.
Cioce V, Csaky KG, Chan AM, Bottaro DP, Taylor WG, Jensen R, Aaronson SA, Rubin JS: Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/NK1 is a naturally occurring HGF/scatter factor variant with partial agonist/antagonist activity. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 13110-13115. 10.1074/jbc.271.22.13110.
Schwall RH, Chang LY, Godowski PJ, Kahn DW, Hillan KJ, Bauer KD, Zioncheck TF: Heparin induces dimerization and confers proliferative activity onto the hepatocyte growth factor antagonists NK1 and NK2. J Cell Biol. 1996, 133: 709-718. 10.1083/jcb.133.3.709.
Silvagno F, Follenzi A, Arese M, Prat M, Giraudo E, Gaudino G, Camussi G, Comoglio PM, Bussolino F: In vivo activation of met tyrosine kinase by heterodimeric hepatocyte growth factor molecule promotes angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995, 15: 1857-1865.
Montesano R, Soriano JV, Malinda KM, Ponce ML, Bafico A, Kleinman HK, Bottaro DP, Aaronson SA: Differential effects of hepatocyte growth factor isoforms on epithelial and endothelial tubulogenesis. Cell Growth Differ. 1998, 9: 355-365.
Matsumoto K, Nakamura T: Mechanisms and significance of bifunctional NK4 in cancer treatment. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 333: 316-327. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.131.
Kuba K, Matsumoto K, Ohnishi K, Shiratsuchi T, Tanaka M, Nakamura T: Kringle 1-4 of hepatocyte growth factor inhibits proliferation and migration of human microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000, 279: 846-852. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4034.
Buhles A, Collins SA, van Pijkeren JP, Rajendran S, Miles M, O'Sullivan GC, O'Hanlon DM, Tangney M: Anti-metastatic effects of viral and non-viral mediated Nk4 delivery to tumours. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2009, 7: 5-10.1186/1479-0556-7-5.
Winn HJ: Immune mechanisms in homotransplantation. II. Quantitative assay of the immunologic activity of lymphoid cells stimulated by tumor homografts. J Immunol. 1961, 86: 228-239.
Tirapu I, Huarte E, Guiducci C, Arina A, Zaratiegui M, Murillo O, Gonzalez A, Berasain C, Berraondo P, Fortes P, et al: Low surface expression of B7-1 (CD80) is an immunoescape mechanism of colon carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 2442-2450. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1681.
Lo WD, Qu G, Sferra TJ, Clark R, Chen R, Johnson PR: Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer to the brain: duration and modulation of expression. Hum Gene Ther. 1999, 10: 201-213. 10.1089/10430349950018995.
Rolling F, Shen WY, Barnett NL, Tabarias H, Kanagasingam Y, Constable I, Rakoczy PE: Long-term real-time monitoring of adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the rat retina. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2000, 28: 382-386. 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00341.x.
Vassalli G, Bueler H, Dudler J, von Segesser LK, Kappenberger L: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors achieve prolonged transgene expression in mouse myocardium and arteries in vivo: a comparative study with adenovirus vectors. Int J Cardiol. 2003, 90: 229-238. 10.1016/S0167-5273(02)00554-5.
Seymour LW, Fisher KD, Green NK, Hale SJ, Lyons M, Mautner V, Nicum S, Onion D, Oupicky D, Stevenson M, Ulbrich K: Adenovirus retargeting and systemic delivery. Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop. 2003, 107-114.
Tangney M, Ahmad S, Collins SA, O'Sullivan GC: Gene therapy for prostate cancer. Postgrad Med. 2010, 122: 166-180. 10.3810/pgm.2010.05.2154.
Cashman JP, Larkin JO, Casey G, Whelan MC, Collins C, Aarons S, Tangney M, O'Sullivan GC: Immune gene therapy as a neoadjuvant to surgical excision to control metastatic cancers. Cancer Lett. 2008, 262: 94-102. 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.11.042.
Casey G, Cashman JP, Morrissey D, Whelan MC, Larkin JO, Soden DM, Tangney M, O'Sullivan GC: Sonoporation mediated immunogene therapy of solid tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010, 36: 430-440. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.11.005.
Ponnazhagan S, Mahendra G, Kumar S, Thompson JA, Castillas M: Conjugate-based targeting of recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2 vectors by using avidin-linked ligands. J Virol. 2002, 76: 12900-12907. 10.1128/JVI.76.24.12900-12907.2002.
Bartlett JS, Kleinschmidt J, Boucher RC, Samulski RJ: Targeted adeno-associated virus vector transduction of nonpermissive cells mediated by a bispecific F(ab'gamma)2 antibody. Nat Biotechnol. 1999, 17: 181-186. 10.1038/6185.
O'Brien MG, Collins CG, Collins JK, Shanahan F, O'Sullivan GC: Oral immune tolerance to tumor specific antigens may confer growth advantage to esophageal and gastric cancers. Dis Esophagus. 2003, 16: 218-223.
Peppoloni S, Herberman RB, Gorelik E: Induction of highly immunogenic variants of Lewis lung carcinoma tumor by ultraviolet irradiation. Cancer Res. 1985, 45: 2560-2566.
Shoham J, Hirsch R, Zakay-Rones Z, Osband ME, Brennert HJ: Augmentation of tumor cell immunogenicity by viruses--an approach to specific immunotherapy of cancer. Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul. 1990, 9: 165-172.
Cai KX, Tse LY, Leung C, Tam PK, Xu R, Sham MH: Suppression of lung tumor growth and metastasis in mice by adeno-associated virus-mediated expression of vasostatin. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 939-949. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1930.
Whelan MC, Casey G, MacConmara M, Lederer JA, Soden D, Collins JK, Tangney M, O'Sullivan GC: Effective immunotherapy of weakly immunogenic solid tumours using a combined immunogene therapy and regulatory T-cell inactivation. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010, 17: 501-511. 10.1038/cgt.2010.8.
Davis HL, Millan CL, Watkins SC: Immune-mediated destruction of transfected muscle fibers after direct gene transfer with antigen-expressing plasmid DNA. Gene Ther. 1997, 4: 181-188. 10.1038/sj.gt.3300380.
Feldman AL, Libutti SK: Progress in antiangiogenic gene therapy of cancer. Cancer. 2000, 89: 1181-1194. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000915)89:6<1181::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO;2-T.
Hamzah J, Jugold M, Kiessling F, Rigby P, Manzur M, Marti HH, Rabie T, Kaden S, Grone HJ, Hammerling GJ, et al: Vascular normalization in Rgs5-deficient tumours promotes immune destruction. Nature. 2008, 453: 410-414. 10.1038/nature06868.
Ryschich E, Schmidt J, Hammerling GJ, Klar E, Ganss R: Transformation of the microvascular system during multistage tumorigenesis. Int J Cancer. 2002, 97: 719-725. 10.1002/ijc.10074.
Buckanovich RJ, Facciabene A, Kim S, Benencia F, Sasaroli D, Balint K, Katsaros D, O'Brien-Jenkins A, Gimotty PA, Coukos G: Endothelin B receptor mediates the endothelial barrier to T cell homing to tumors and disables immune therapy. Nat Med. 2008, 14: 28-36. 10.1038/nm1699.
This work was supported through grant funding from Science Foundation Ireland (06/RF/BIC055) and Cancer Research Ireland (CRI07TAN).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
SAC performed the in vitro and in vivo experiments, and contributed to drafting the manuscript. AB constructed AAVNk4, AAVBB. MFS, PTH, GCO'S, DMO'H and MT were the coordinators of the project. MT designed the studies and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.