Open Access

Human cytomegalovirus plasmid-based amplicon vector system for gene therapy

  • Kutubuddin Mahmood1,
  • Mark N Prichard1,
  • Gregory M Duke1,
  • George W Kemble1 and
  • Richard R Spaete1Email author
Genetic Vaccines and Therapy20053:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-3-1

Received: 28 August 2004

Accepted: 26 January 2005

Published: 26 January 2005

Abstract

We have constructed and evaluated the utility of a helper-dependent virus vector system that is derived from Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV). This vector is based on the herpes simplex virus (HSV) amplicon system and contains the HCMV orthologs of the two cis-acting functions required for replication and packaging of HSV genomes, the complex HCMV viral DNA replication origin (oriLyt), and the cleavage packaging signal (the a sequence). The HCMV amplicon vector replicated independently and was packaged into infectious virions in the presence of helper virus. This vector is capable of delivering and expressing foreign genes in infected cells including progenitor cells such as human CD34+ cells. Packaged defective viral genomes were passaged serially in fibroblasts and could be detected at passage 3; however, the copy number appeared to diminish upon serial passage. The HCMV amplicon offers an alternative vector strategy useful for gene(s) delivery to cells of the hematopoietic lineage.

Background

HCMV is a member of the betaherpesvirus family [42, 48]. Other members of this family include human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), and human herpesvirus 7 (HHV-7), and all are widely distributed in human populations. During productive replication, the 230 kilobase pair (kbp) viral genome replicates by a rolling circle mechanism, which generates long head-to-tail concatemers that are cleaved to unit length and packaged in capsids. The state of the HCMV genome during latency remains unidentified and is likely to be circular and extrachromosomal [6]. The HCMV genome has been detected in cells within the hematopoietic lineage as early as CD34+ progenitors and up through differentiated macrophages [23, 29, 38, 54].

Defective HSV viruses created by high multiplicity serial passage of virus stocks have been described on numerous occasions and have been characterized in detail at the molecular level [13, 18, 31, 43, 52, 67]. Naturally occurring defective HSV viruses and laboratory derived HSV amplicon vectors are composed of head-to-tail tandem reiterations of subgenomic regions containing a functional origin of DNA replication (OriSor OriL) and a DNA cleavage/packaging signal [3, 4, 30, 57, 6062]. These two cis-acting functions can be relatively small ranging from ca. 90–150 base pairs (bp) for the ori and ca. 250–300 bp for the a sequence. The functional HCMV oriLyt is much more complex than either of the HSV oris; the HCMV oriLyt consists of multiple direct and inverted repeats and extends over at least 1500 bp [1, 2, 24, 37]. HCMV is unique among the herpesviruses in not having an origin binding protein homolog that is required for DNA replication [45]. The HCMV a sequence varies in size from ca. 550 bp to 762 bp, however, the conserved pac-1 and pac-2 cis-elements which determine the sites for cleavage of replicated viral DNA are present [15, 28, 58, 64, 65].

In contrast to HSV, HCMV does not efficiently produce defective virus genomes, this difference may be related to the distinct biology of the two viruses [45]. However two reports described the identification of what may potentially be HCMV defective viruses created by serial high multiplicity passage [47, 59]. These reports characterized HCMV defectives as very large subgenomic DNA molecules, in some cases extending over two thirds of the genome. In addition to these replication defective HCMV viruses, a recent report by Borst et al. 2003 [7], described the construction of an HCMV amplicon. In this report we further utilized the HCMV amplicon for gene delivery to human CD34+ cells.

HCMV infects cells of the hematopoietic lineage [34, 38, 39, 55, 68]. Viral genomes can be found in CD34+ cells from seropositive individuals and granulocyte-macrophage progenitors and differentiated macrophages can be infected experimentally [56]. We were interested in determining whether the tropism of HCMV can be exploited to construct defective HCMV virus vectors (amplicons) targeted to hematopoietic stem cells. The general feasibility of such an approach for other cell types has been shown using other herpesviruses, e.g. HSV, EBV, and HHV-7 [20, 25, 26, 30, 35, 49, 70, 71].

Methods

Cells and virus

HCMV Toledo (passage 8, from Dr. S. Plotkin, Aventis Pasteur, Doylestown, PA), and HCMV TownevarRIT (passage 134, from Dr. Plotkin via Dr. Ed Mocarski, Stanford University), were propagated in human fibroblasts (HF) cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, Kans.). Recombinant HCMV, RC2.7EGFP, expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA), under the control of the major early 2.7 promoter, was constructed by cotransfection of plasmid pEAG2.7EGFP with a set of overlapping cosmid clones derived from HCMV Toledo (G.M. Duke, unpublished data).

Plasmid constructions

Plasmid pON205 (Spaete and Mocarski, 1985), contains the Towne strain a sequence, was obtained from Ed Mocarski (Stanford University). pEAG2.7EGFP was derived by cloning the EGFP gene from plasmid pEGFP-N2 (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA) between the EagI and SmaI site of the β2.7 gene taken from Toledo (G.M. Duke, unpublished data). HCMV amplicon plasmid Tn9-8 was derived by inserting the 6 kpb DraI fragment of TownevarRIT (corresponding to nucleotides 91,166 – 95,909 relative to AD169) (Figure 1B), spanning the HCMV oriLyt into the EcoRI site of pON205. Tn9-8 was partially sequenced by single-cycle and multicycle dideoxy-nucleotide chain termination method of Sanger et al., [51]. The plasmids designated Tn9-8GF5 and Tn9-8GF7 incorporating the EGFP gene with the HCMV Major Immediate Early (MIE) promoter and SV40 poly A sequence was isolated as a 2,334 bp NsiI fragment from plasmid pEGFP-N2 (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA), and cloned into the HCMV amplicon Tn9-8 at the PstI site in both orientations. The gpt gene in Tn9-8-gpt was derived by cloning a PCR fragment from Escherichia coli DH5α using the primer pairs 5'CTGCAGCTAGTCTAGACTGGGACACTTCACATGAGC3'and 5'CTGCAGCTATGTATCTAGAGCCAGGCGTTGAAAAGATTA3'.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of amplified region near oriLyt of the HCMV genome. A. Restriction enzyme map of minimal oriLyt and adjacent region of heterogeneity (block). B. Region of heterogeneity shown as a dimer. Arrow indicates junction of the repeat segment. The number 91,166 to the left of the restriction map corresponds to the nucleotide position of the AD169 genome (EMBL accession number X17403). C. Autoradiograph of Southern blot utilizing a minimal oriLyt probe, pON2623 (Kemble et al., 1996). Monomers and dimers are depicted with one and two arrows, respectively. Trimers and tetramers can be seen in the TownevarRIT viral stock.

Generation of viral stocks containing amplicons

Plasmid DNA was transfected by CaPO4 precipitation of approximately 4 μg of Tn9-8 amplicon DNA. The Tn9-8 DNA was transfected into approximately 1 × 106 passage 16 human fibroblast (HF) cells. At 24 hours post transfection, the cells were infected with CMV Towne at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 plaque forming units (PFU) per cell. Fresh medium was added to cells four days after infection and cells were harvested at 6 to 7 days post infection as described previously (Spaete and Frenkel, 1982). Virus stocks are prepared by three freeze-thaw cycles. Serial passages of amplicon-containing viral stocks on fresh HF cells were superinfected with CMV Towne as a helper virus at a MOI of 1.

Southern blot analysis

Viral DNAs were digested with restriction enzyme, electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gels, transferred to Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Corp.), (Maniatis et al., 1989), and immobilized with a UV Crosslinker 1000 (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA). DNA on the membrane was probed with fluorescein-labeled pUC9 DNA using conditions previously described (Spaete and Mocarski, 1985).

Isolation of CD34+cells and infection with CMV

The isolation of cord blood CD34+ stem cells was carried out by All Cells Inc. (Berkeley, CA) using CD34 Progenitor Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, CA). The positive selection of the CD34+ cells was carried out using hapten-conjugated antibody to CD34+ followed by anti-hapten antibody coupled to MACS Microbeads. The magnetically labeled cells are enriched on positive selection columns in the magnetic field. The purity of the CD34+ population was >95% as analyzed by flow cytometry. The purified CD34+ cells were suspended in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's Minimal Essential Medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum. 2 × 105 CD34+ cells were used for each infection with TN9-8GF5 amplicon containing stocks, RC2.7EGFP virus, CMV Towne virus, or uninfected cell control. The cells mixed with virus were centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 mins at room temperature and were then placed in 37°C water bath for one hour. Following this the cells were cultured in 6-well cell culture plates (Costar) for 18–72 hours. At the end of the incubation the cells were harvested for CD34 staining.

EGFP expression and immunostaining for flow cytometric analysis

Amplicon containing viral stocks prepared from passage 1 were used to infect HF or human CD34+ cells maintained in 12 well culture plates. At 24 hour intervals post infection, the wells were observed for EGFP expression with a Nikon TE2000 microscope under UV illumination. Immunostaining for CD34+ cells was done using Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD34 antibody (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Infected or control cells were incubated with 20 μl of PE-labeled anti-CD34 antibody for 45 minutes at room temperature and subsequently were washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% BSA. The cells were directly analyzed for EGFP and CD34+ staining on a FACSCalibur instrument (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), at 18 and 36 hours post infection.

Results

In order to exploit the natural tropism of HCMV for cells of the hematopoietic lineage, in a nonlytic manner, an HCMV amplicon i.e. a plasmid containing the HCMV oriLyt and a sequences was constructed. Theoretically, due to the large size of the HCMV genome, an amplicon derived from this virus should be able to carry the large DNA inserts and be capable of efficient introduction into hematopoietic cells by infection.

Heterogeneity at oriLyt

During analysis of cosmid clones of HCMV strain Towne, sequence heterogeneity was observed in the EcoRI E fragment of Towne that was not present in the Toledo strain [27]. The EcoRI E region spans in part the complex oriLyt region [1, 2, 24, 37]. Sequences in a 1.2 kbp repeat fragment were shown to give rise to the heterogeneity observed at this locus in the Towne genome (Figure 1). The coordinates of a single repeat unit starts at nucleotide 94,561 relative to the AD169 sequence and end at nucleotide 95,807 [10]. This segment can repeat at least three times in Towne strains from different passage histories (Fig. 1). This heterogeneity is different from the 189 bp repeat region previously described for the Towne strain oriLyt which occurs near the BamHI sites in Figure 1 (nt 93337–93525 relative to AD169), [11, 12]. Since Towne replicates to relatively high titers in cell culture, it was deemed advantageous to incorporate this heterogeneity in the origin containing sequences to be used in the amplicon construct.

Construction of the HCMV amplicon

As a test of the feasibility of the system, an HCMV amplicon was constructed which incorporated the two cis-acting functions required for the propagation of the defective virus genomes in the presence of helper virus (Figure 2). HCMV amplicon plasmid Tn9-8 was derived by inserting the 6 kpb DraI fragment of Towne (corresponding to nucleotides 91,166–95,909 relative to AD169) [10] (Figure 1B), spanning the HCMV oriLyt into the EcoRI site of pON205. The resulting amplicon was designated Tn9-8 (Figure 2), and was partially sequenced to verify its structure.
Figure 2

Schematic representation of the HCMV amplicon plasmids Tn9-8gpt, Tn9-8GF7 and Tn9-8GF5. The EGFP expression cassette was cloned in two orientations in the unique PstI site in Tn9-8. The gpt expression cassette was cloned between the unique PstI and HindIII sites.

Generation of viral stocks containing amplicons

As a test of the ability of this construct to function as an amplicon, plasmid Tn9-8 was transfected in human fibroblast (HF) cells, and subsequently infected with HCMV Towne strain at an MOI of 5 to provide helper virus replication functions. Seven days later, infected cells were harvested, sonicated, and viral stocks were prepared for passage to fresh HF cells. Fresh HF cells were infected with the progeny of the transfection/infection and incubated for 7 days. The DNA from these infected cells was harvested (designated passage 1), restricted with HindIII and DpnI, and Southern blotted [36]. Southern blot analyses of DNA demonstrated that Tn9-8 was susceptible to digestion with DpnI, consistent with replication of the plasmid in bacteria (Figure 3, lane 2). In contrast, Tn9-8 in infected cells was resistant to DpnI demonstrating that it had replicated in eucaryotic cells (Figure 3, lanes 3–5). This observation is consistent with replication and packaging of Tn9-8 into infectious virions. These results demonstrate that foreign DNA sequences, exemplified by the plasmid pUC9, can be introduced into defective genomes that are packaged and propagated in serially passaged virus stocks. To examine whether these results were the consequence of amplicon replication and packaging or integration of the amplicon plasmid into the helper virus, DNA prepared from passage 1 infected cells was digested with Cla I, Xba I, Afl II and Dpn I. These enzymes digested the Towne helper virus DNA to fragments no larger than 13.6 kbp but do not cut within Tn9-8. The amplicon DNA was significantly larger than 23 kbp consistent with the amplicon being replicated as a concatamer (Figure 4). This result indicated that the high molecular weight DNA containing plasmid sequences was packaged independently and was not integrated into helper virus.
Figure 3

Southern blot analysis of passage 1 of HCMV amplicon DNA probed with plasmid pUC9. Lane 1. Plasmid Tn9-8 linearized with Hind III serves as a marker for correct migration of monomeric repeats. Lane 2. Plasmid Tn9-8 restricted with Hind III and Dpn I as a control for non-replicating DNA. Lanes 3–5. Infected cell DNAs restricted with Hind III and Dpn I. The signal in lanes 3–5 (arrow) demonstrates authentic replication and packaging of amplicon Tn9-8 in eucaryotic cells.

Figure 4

Southern blot analysis of high molecular weight HCMV amplicon DNA at passage 1 probed with plasmid pUC9. DNA prepared from passage 1 infected cells was digested with Cla I, Xba I, Afl II and Dpn I, Southern blotted and probed with plasmid pUC9. The samples are from those shown in Fig. 3, lanes 3 and 5. The high molecular weight DNA containing plasmid sequences (arrow) demonstrates the major hybridizing species migrating slower than the 23 kbp lambda DNA Hind III digest indicated as the marker on the left of the autoradiograph.

Packaged defective viral genomes derived from Tn9-8 or a derivative containing a selectable marker (Tn9-8-gpt), were serially passaged in HF cells. Defective viruses could be detected at passage 3 when probed with plasmid pUC9; however, the copy number appeared to diminish upon serial passage (not shown). Selection with mycophenolic acid on Tn9-8-gpt amplicons did not enhance recovery.

Rescue of monomeric repeat units in bacteria

Concatemeric DNA was prepared from passage 2 and 3 virus stocks containing the defective virus genomes (Tn9-8-gpt), digested with Pst I and Hind III, respectively, in order to analyze monomeric repeat units. The Hind III-digested DNA was circularized by ligation and used to transform E. coli bacteria to analyze structure and to demonstrate shuttle vector capability between eucaryotic and bacterial hosts. A number of plasmids prepared from the rescue attempt had a restriction enzyme pattern indistinguishable from the input (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and 2). Other plasmids however exhibited the expected restriction pattern consistent with a head-to-tail amplification of the a sequence (lanes 3 and 4). Digestion with NaeI produced a fragment of the predicted size of a unit length a sequence (762 bp), and this product hybridized with an a sequence specific probe (PstI-SgrAI fragment from Tn9-8), (Figs. 2 and 5B, lanes 3 and 4). This type of amplification has been readily seen in restriction enzyme digested DNA preparations of parental genomes of both HSV and HCMV [31, 40, 41, 58, 64, 69] and has also been observed in HSV amplicons using Southern blot hybridizations [15].
Figure 5

Tn9-8-gpt was rescued from concatamers following serial passage in HF cells. (A) Tn9-8-gpt was passaged in HF cells and monomer units were recovered by linearizing concatemeric DNA from serial passage 3 with HindIII and cloning in bacteria (lanes 2 and 4) and also by linearizing passage 2 DNA with PstI and cloning in bacteria (lane 3). Lane 1 represents the unpassaged clone for comparison. Following rescue in bacteria, DNA was prepared and cut with NcoI. Fragments were separated on an agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide staining (left panel). The gel was transferred to a nylon membrane and probed with an a sequence specific probe (right panel). (B) Fragments from an NaeI digest were also separated on an agarose gel and visualized as in panel A. The gel was transferred to a nylon membrane and probed with an a sequence specific probe. Lane 5 shows a 100 bp ladder. Lanes 3 and 4 show a ca. 800 bp fragment that hybridizes to a sequences.

Expression of heterologous genes in an HCMV amplicon

To demonstrate that the HCMV amplicon could be used as a vector system to support the expression of a foreign gene, EGFP under the transcriptional control of the HCMV major immediate early (MIE) promoter was used as test reporter gene. Two resulting amplicon plasmids designated Tn9-8GF5 and Tn9-8GF7 both expressed EGFP following transfection of HF cells in the absence of helper virus, as expected (not shown). Packaged amplicons were generated by introduction of Tn9-8GF5 into cells and infecting with HCMV 24 hours later at an MOI of 5. Transfection-derived viral stocks were passaged onto fresh HF cells supplemented with Towne helper virus at an MOI of 1. Viral stocks prepared from passage 1 were used to infect HF cells and grown on 12-well tissue culture plates. A limited number (ca. 0. 1%) of brightly fluorescing cells could be seen by microscopic examination at 24, 72 and 96 hours post-infection (Figure 6). This demonstrates that a foreign gene can be expressed in the context of a HCMV amplicon viral stock in infected HF cells.
Figure 6

Fluorescent Microscopic Analysis of TN9-8GF5 amplicon infected cells. Human fibroblast cells (HF) or human cord blood CD34+ cells were infected with TN9-8GF5 amplicon-containing stocks, or mock infected. Cells were observed at different time-points 24, 72 and 96 hrs post infection with TN9-8GF5 amplicon under the fluorescent microscope (Nikon TE2000 microscope). EGFP expressing fluorescent cells were observed in the TN9-8GF5 amplicon infected human fibroblast cells or human CD34+ cells at different time-points. Control uninfected cells were negative (not shown).

To test the utility of the HCMV amplicon in gene therapy or gene delivery, we used packaged amplicons in viral stocks to infect and deliver an expressed gene into human CD34+ progenitor cells. Viral stocks containing amplicons carrying EGFP under the transcriptional control of the HCMV major immediate early (MIE) promoter prepared from passage 0 and passage 1 were used to infect CD34+ cells derived from cord blood. Starting at 24 h after infection, CD34+ cells were examined for EGFP expression by fluorescent microscopy. EGFP expression was observed in TN9-8GF5 amplicon-infected CD34+ cells starting at 24 h post-infection. The cells remained positive for EGFP expression for more than 96 hrs, at which point the cells were terminated (Figure 6).

In a separate experiment, at 36 hours post infection, the cells were stained with PE-labeled anti-CD34 and analyzed for the CD34 marker and EGFP expression. EGFP expression was observed in the CD34+ population in the TN9-8GF5 amplicon (0.3%, 0.1%) (Figure 7a, &7b) or the CMV-EGFP virus (0.6%) (Figure 7c) at 36 hours post infection. The CMV Towne control-virus infected cells or uninfected CD34+ cell control were negative for EGFP expression (Figure 7d, &7e). A small population (7–12%) of the cells lost expression of the CD34+ marker upon in vitro culture. EGFP expression was also observed in a CD34(-) population infected with either TN9-8GF5 amplicon containing viral stocks (0.8%, 0.1%) or with the CMV-EGFP virus, RC2.7EGFP (3.6%) (Figure 7a, 7b &7c). The CMV Towne infected cells or uninfected control cell also had a significant CD34 negative population but were negative for EGFP expression (Figure 7d, and 7e). These results clearly demonstrate that CD34+ cells can be infected with replication competent or incompetent CMV vectors expressing a foreign gene.
Figure 7

Flow cytometry analysis of human cord blood CD34+ cells infected with CMV amplicon containing stocks, virus, or uninfected cell control. TN9-8GF5 amplicon (a,b), CMV-EGFP (RC2.7EGFP) virus (c), CMV (Towne) infected (d), or control uninfected human cord blood CD34 cells (e,f), were stained 36 hours post-infection with PE-antiCD34 antibody (a-e), or were left unstained (f), and were analyzed for two-color cytometry analysis using a FACS Calibur instrument. The dot-plots are generated using Cell Quest software and reveal the EGFP+ cells populations. Numbers in the upper right and lower right quadrants indicate percentage of the EGFP+CD34+ and EGFP+CD34- cells respectively. A frequency lower than 0.01% is considered negative.

Conclusions

We have shown that a replication-defective virus vector system that is derived from HCMV is capable of delivering and expressing foreign genes in infected primary cells including progenitor stem cells such as human CD34+ cells. Further improvement and optimization of the system offers the potential to deliver gene-based therapies to multipotent cells.

Advantages for use of the HCMV amplicon

Foremost among the advantages of the vector system we have described is the potential ability to efficiently infect and deliver genetic information to hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+) and other dividing and non-dividing cell types which may support HCMV infection [34, 38, 39, 55, 68]. Genetic hematological disorders such as thalassemias and sickle-cell anemia and other hemaglobinopathies could therefore be targeted for therapy with this strategy. Another potential advantage for the system is that vector DNA could possibly be maintained as an episome with minimal concern for the potential consequences of random integration of vector DNA (i.e. activation of oncogenes or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes). In order to insure efficient segregation as an episome, the EBV latent replication origin, oriP, and the transactivator, EBNA-1, could be added as was previously shown for another hybrid herpesvirus vector [71]. However such a modification may not be necessary because HCMV genomes appear to be carried continuously in cells of hematopoietic origin in infected individuals. Yet another potential advantage as with other herpesviral vectors, is that the HCMV vector system should have the capacity for very large inserts.

Infection of CD34+ cells with HCMV

The infectivity of CD34+ cells from seropositive and seronegative subjects with HCMV has been tested both in vivo and in vitro [53]. Furthermore, hematopoietic stem cells are also reported as a site for HCMV latency. Efficient transduction of human CD34+ cells with retroviral and non-viral vectors has been unsatisfactory due to the lack of maintenance of high levels of expression of the transgene following engraftment of the engineered cells [16]. The HCMV MIE promoter may not be the right promoter for optimal expression in a CD34+ cells, since it has been shown that in the context of a lentiviral-based gene transfer system this promoter appeared to function less efficiently due to a cell-type specific expression defect [16]. The approaches to improving the efficiency of gene transfer into human cells have focused on improving gene delivery vectors and optimizing ex vivo culture conditions, which preserve the developmental properties of the stem cells [14, 22]. Umbilical cord blood is recognized as a rich source of hematopoietic CD34+ stem cells [33]. In our experiments we used cord blood derived CD34+ cells for infection with HCMV amplicon containing stocks or HCMV-EGFP virus. However, bone marrow derived CD34+ cells have also been shown to be infectable in vitro with HCMV [34]. Gentry & Smith [21], reported a progressive loss of primitive cell properties including a reduction of CD34 expression upon in vitro culture of cord blood derived CD34+ cells. In a separate study, cord blood derived CD34+ cells cultured with IL-3 in vitro showed a progressive decline of the CD34+ population and more differentiated cells originating in the CD34(-) population [9]. In our experiments with >95% pure cord blood derived CD34+ cell population, a loss of CD34 expression in a small percent population (9–12%) of stem cells upon in vitro culture has been observed. EGFP expression was also seen in the CD34(-) population (Fig 7a, 7b, &7c). It is possible that HCMV infection of CD34 cells could induce cell differentiation and loss of primitive properties including reduction of CD34 expression.

Further studies of HCMV infection in CD34 cells will help in defining whether CD34+ infected cells undergo cell differentiation by increased expression of other markers such as CD33, CD38, HLA-DR or cytokines. It is also relevant to note here that HCMV virus carries homolog sequences for HLA-related and cytokine-related molecules and infection can induce cellular cytokines [5, 8, 19, 32, 44, 46, 50, 66]. The HCMV amplicons contain only the cis-acting ori and packaging sequences, and have no structural gene sequences. However, amplicon containing viral stocks are a mixture with HCMV replication competent helper virus. HCMV induced cell-differentiating effect, if any, might be minimized using a helper virus-free amplicon system. In this regard, it should be possible to test a number of strategies to prepare helper virus-free stocks [17, 63]. These preparations would be useful for therapeutic applications in immuno-compromised patients.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MedImmune Vaccines Inc.

References

  1. Anders DG, Kacica MA, Pari G, Punturieri SM: Boundaries and structure of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt, a complex origin for lytic-phase DNA replication. J Virol. 1992, 66: 3373-3384.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anders DG, Punturieri SM: Multicomponent origin of cytomegalovirus lytic-phase DNA replication. J Virol. 1991, 65: 931-937.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett JW, Eppstein DA, Chan HW: Class I defective herpes simplex virus DNA as a molecular cloning vehicle in eucaryotic cells. J Virol. 1983, 48: 384-95.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bear SE, Colberg-Poley AM, Court DL, Carter BJ, Enquist LW: Analysis of two potential shuttle vectors containing herpes simplex virus defective DNA. J Mol Appl Genet. 1984, 2: 471-84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck S, Barrell B: An HCMV reading frame which has similarity with both the V and C regions of the TCR gamma chain. DNA Seq. 1991, 2: 33-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolovan-Fritts CA, Mocarski ES, Wiedeman JA: Peripheral blood CD14(+) cells from healthy subjects carry a circular conformation of latent cytomegalovirus genome. Blood. 1999, 93: 394-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borst EM, Messerle M: Construction of a cytomegalovirus-based amplicon: a vector with a unique transfer capacity. Hum Gene Ther. 2003, 14: 959-70. 10.1089/104303403766682223.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne H, Smith GSB, Minson T: A complex between the MHC class I homologue encoded by human cytomegalovirus and beta 2 microglobulin. Nature. 1990, 347: 770-2. 10.1038/347770a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caux C, Favre C, Saeland S, Duvert V, Mannoni P, Durand I, Aubry JP, deVries JE: Sequential loss of CD34 and class II MHC antigens on purified cord blood hematopoietic progenitors cultured with IL-3: characterization of CD34-, HLA-DR+ cells. Blood. 1989, 74: 1287-94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chee MS, Bankier ATSB, Bohni R, Brown CM, Cerny R, Horsnell T, Hutchison CA, Kouzarides T, Martignetti JA, Preddie E, Satchwell SC, Tomlinson P, Weston KM, Barrell BG: Analysis of the protein-coding content of the sequence of the human cytomegalovirus strain AD169. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Edited by: McDougall JK. 1990, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 154: 125-169.Google Scholar
  11. Chen Z, Sugano S, Watanabe S: A 189-bp repeat region within the human cytomegalovirus replication origin contains a sequence dispensable but irreplaceable with other sequences. Virology. 1999, 258: 240-248. 10.1006/viro.1999.9735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Z, Watanabe S, Yamaguchi N: Strain-dependent differences in the human cytomegalovirus replication origin. Arch of Virology. 1996, 141: 13-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuifo DM, Hayward GS: Tandem repeat defective DNA from the L segment of the HSV genome. Herpesvirus DNA Series. Edited by: Becker Y. 1981, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 107-128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. de Wynter EA, Emmerson AJ, Testa NG: Properties of peripheral blood and cord blood stem cells. Baillierres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 1999, 12: 1-17. 10.1053/beha.1999.0003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Deiss LP, Frenkel N: Herpes simplex virus amplicon: cleavage of concatemeric DNA is linked to packaging and involves amplification of the terminally reiterated a sequence. J Virol. 1986, 57: 933-41.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas JL, Lin WY, Panis ML, Veres G: Efficient human immunodeficiency virus-based vector transduction of unstimulated human mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells in the SCID-hu Thy/Liv model of human T cell lymphopoiesis. Hum Gene Ther. 2001, 12: 401-13. 10.1089/10430340150504028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraefel C, Song S, Lim F, Lang P, Yu L, Wang Y, Wild P, Geller AI: Helper virus-free transfer of herpes simplex virus type 1 plasmid vectors into neural cells. J Virol. 1996, 70: 7190-97.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Frenkel N, Locker H, Batterson W, Hayward GS, Roizman B: Anatomy of herpes simplex virus DNA. VI. Defective DNA originates from the S component. J Virol. 1976, 20: 527-31.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao JL, Murphy PM: Human cytomegalovirus open reading frame US28 encodes a functional beta chemokine receptor. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 28539-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Geller AI, Yu L, Wang Y, Fraefel C: Helper virus-free herpes simplex virus-1 plasmid vectors for gene therapy of Parkinson's disease and other neurological disorders. Exp Neurol. 1997, 144: 98-102. 10.1006/exnr.1996.6394.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentry T, Smith C: Retroviral vector-mediated gene transfer into umbilical cord blood CD34br, CD38-, CD33- cells. Exp Hematol Stem Cell Res. 1999, 27 (8): 1244-54.Google Scholar
  22. Goerner M, Roecklein B, Torok-Storb B, Heimfeld S, Kiem HP: Expansion and transduction of nonenriched human cord blood cells using HS-5 conditioned medium and FLT3-L. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000, 9: 759-65. 10.1089/15258160050196803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hahn G, Jores R, Mocarski ES: Cytomegalovirus remains latent in a common precursor of dendritic and myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 3937-42. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3937.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamzeh FM, Lietman PS, Gibson W, Hayward GS: Identification of the lytic origin of DNA replication in human cytomegalovirus by a novel approach utilizing ganciclovir-induced chain termination. J Virol. 1990, 64: 6184-6195.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho DY: Amplicon-based herpes simplex virus vectors. Methods Cell Biol. 1994, 43: 191-210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs A, Breakfield XO, Fraefel C: HSV-1-based vectors for gene therapy of neurological diseases and brain tumors: part II. Vector systems and applications. Neoplasia. 1999, 1: 402-416. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900056.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kemble G, Duke G, Winter R, Spaete R: Defined large-scale alterations of the human cytomegalovirus genome constructed by cotransfection of overlapping cosmids. J Virol. 1996, 70: 2044-48.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kemble GW, Mocarski ES: A host cell protein binds to a highly conserved sequence element (pac-2) with the cytomegalovirus a sequence. J Virol. 1989, 63: 4715-28.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kondo K, Kaneshima H, Mocarski ES: Human cytomegalovirus latent infection of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91: 11879-83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kwong AD, Frenkel N: Biology of herpes simplex virus (HSV) defective viruses and development of the amplicon system. "Viral Vectors". 1995, Academic Press, Inc, 25-42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Locker H, Frenkel N: Structure and origin of defective genomes contained in serially passaged herpes simplex type 1 (Justin). J Virol. 1979, 29: 1065-77.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lockridge KM, Zhou SS, Kravitz RH, Johnson JL, Sawai ET, Blewett EL, Barry PA: Primate cytomegaloviruses encode and express an IL-10-like protein. Virology. 2000, 268: 272-80. 10.1006/viro.2000.0195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Luther-Wyrsch A, Costello E, Thali M, Buetti E, Nissen C, Surbek D, Holzgreve W, Gratwohl A, Tichelli A, Wodnar-Filipowicz A: Stable transduction with lentiviral vectors and amplification of immature hematopoietic progenitors from cord blood of preterm human fetuses. Hum Gene Ther. 2001, 12: 377-89. 10.1089/10430340150504000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Maciejewski JP, Bruening EE, Donahue RE, Mocarski ES, Young NS, St Jeor SC: Infection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by human cytomegalovirus. Blood. 1992, 80: 170-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahmood K, Tolba K, Federoff H, Rosenblatt JD: The role of HSV amplicon vectors in cancer gene therapy. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology. 1999, 4: 209-219.Google Scholar
  36. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  37. Masse MJ, Karlin S, Schachtel GA, Mocarski ES: Human cytomegalovirus origin of DNA replication (oriLyt) resides within a highly complex repetitive region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 1992, 89: 5246-5250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendelson M, Monard S, Sissons P, Sinclair J: Detection of endogenous human cytomegalovirus in CD34+ bone marrow progenitors. J Gen Virol. 1996, 77: 3099-102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mocarski ES, Bonyhadi M, Salimi S, McCune JM, Kaneshima H: Human cytomegalovirus in a SCID-hu mouse: thymic epithelial cells are prominent targets of viral replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 104-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mocarski ES, Liu AC, Spaete RR: Structure and variability of the a sequence in the genome of human cytomegalovirus (Towne strain). J Gen Virol. 1987, 68: 2223-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mocarski ES, Roizman B: Site-specific inversion sequence of the herpes simplex virus genome: domain and structural features. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981, 78: 7047-51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mocarski ES, Courcelle CT: Cytomegaloviruses and Their Replication. Virology. 2001, Lippincott – Williams & Wilkins Publishers, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  43. Murray BK, Biswal N, Bookout JB, Lanford RE, Courtney RJ, Melnick JL: Cyclic appearance of defective interfering particles of herpes simplex virus and the concomitant accumulation of early polypeptide VP175. Intervirology. 1975, 5: 173-84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Neote K, DiGregorio D, Mak JY, Horuk R, Schall TJ: Molecular cloning, functional expression, and signaling characteristics of a C-C chemokine receptor. Cell. 1993, 72: 415-25. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90118-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pari GS, Anders DG: Eleven loci encoding trans-acting factors are required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt-dependent DNA replication. J Virol. 1993, 67: 6979-88.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Penfold ME, Dairaghi DJ, Duke GM, Saederup N, Mocarski ES, Kemble GW, Schall TJ: Cytomegalovirus encodes a potent alpha chemokine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 9839-44. 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9839.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramirez ML, Virmani M, Garon C, Rosenthal LJ: Defective virions of human cytomegalovirus. Virology. 1979, 96: 311-14. 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90201-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roizman B, Pellett PE: The Family Herpesviridae: A Brief Introduction. Virology. 2001, Lippincott – Williams & Wilkins Publishers, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  49. Romi H, Singer O, Rapaport D, Frenkel N: Tamplicon-7, a novel T-lymphotrpic vector derived from human herpesvirus 7. J Virol. 1999, 73: 7001-07.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Saederup N, Lin YC, Dairaghi DJ, Schall TJ, Mocarski ES: Cytomegalovirus-encoded beta chemokine promotes monocyte-associated viremia in the host. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999, 96: 10881-86. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10881.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR: DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977, 74: 5463-67.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Schroder CH, Stegmann B, Lauppe HF, Kaerner HC: An unusual defective genotype derived from herpes simplex virus strain ANG. Intervirology. 1975, 6: 270-84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sindre H, Tjoonnfjord GE, Rollag H, Ranneberg-Nilsen T, Veiby OP, Beck S, Degre M, Hestdal K: Human cytomegalovirus suppression of and latency in early hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 1996, 88: 4526-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Slobedman B, Mocarski ES: Quantitative analysis of latent human cytomegalovirus. J Virol. 1999, 73: 4806-12.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Soderberg C, Larsson S, Bergstedt-Lindqvist S, Moller E: Definition of a subset of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells that are permissive to human cytomegalovirus infection. J Virol. 1993, 67: 3166-75.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Soderberg-Naucler C, Fish KN, Nelson JA: Reactivation of latent human cytomegalovirus by allogeneic stimulation of blood cells from healthy donors. Cell. 1997, 91: 119-26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80014-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Spaete RR, Frenkel N: The herpes simplex virus amplicon: A new eucaryotic defective-virus cloning-amplifying vector. Cell. 1982, 30: 295-304. 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90035-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Spaete RR, Mocarski ES: The a sequence of the cytomegalovirus genome functions as a cleavage/packaging signal for herpes simplex virus defective genomes. J Virol. 1985, 54: 817-824.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Stinski MF, Mocarski ES, Thomsen DR: DNA of human cytomegalovirus: size heterogeneity and defectiveness resulting from serial undiluted passage. J Virol. 1979, 31: 231-39.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Stow ND: Localization of an origin of DNA replication within the TRS/IRS repeated region of the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome. Embo J. 1982, 1: 863-7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Stow ND, McMonagle EC: Characterization of the TRS/IRS origin of DNA replication of herpes simplex virus type 1. Virology. 1983, 130: 427-38. 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90097-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stow ND, McMonagle EC, Davison AJ: Fragments from both termini of the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome contain signals required for the encapsidation of viral DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11: 8205-20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun M, Zhang GR, Yang T, Yu L, Geller AI: Improved titers for helper virus-free herpes simplex virus type 1 plasmid vectors by optimization of the packaging protocol and addition of noninfectious herpes simplex virus-related particles (previral DNA replication enveloped particles) to the packaging procedure. Hum Gene Ther. 1999, 10: 2005-11. 10.1089/10430349950017365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tamashiro JC, Filpula D, Friedmann T, Spector DH: Structure of the heterogeneous L-S junction region of human cytomegalovirus strain AD169 DNA. J Virol. 1984, 52: 541-48.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Tamashiro JC, Spector DH: Terminal structure and heterogeneity in human cytomegalovirus strain AD169. J Virol. 1986, 59: 591-604.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Vieira J, Schall TJ, Corey L, Geballe AP: Functional analysis of the human cytomegalovirus US28 gene by insertion mutagenesis with the green fluorescent protein gene. J Virol. 1998, 72: 8158-65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Vlazny DA, Frenkel N: Replication of herpes simplex virus DNA: localization of replication recognition signals within defective virus genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981, 78: 742-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. von Laer D, Meyer-Koenig U, Serr A, Finke J, Kanz L, Fauser AA, Neumann-Haefelin D, Brugger W, Hufert FT: Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in CD34+ cells from blood and bone marrow. Blood. 1995, 86: 4086-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wagner MJ, Summers WC: Structure of the joint region and the termini of the DNA of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol. 1978, 27: 374-87.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang F, Seldin DC, Annis B, Trocha A, Johnson RP: Immune modulation of human B lymphocytes by gene transfer with recombinant Epstein-Barr virus amplicons. J Virol Methods. 1998, 72: 81-93. 10.1016/S0166-0934(98)00023-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang S, Vos J-M: A hybrid herpesvirus infectious vector based on Epstein-Barr virus and herpes simplex virus type 1 for gene transfer into human cells in vitro and in vivo. J Virol. 1996, 70: 8422-8430.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mahmood et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement